NDLI: Accuracy of head motion compensation for the HRRT: Comparison of methods

Content Provider	IEEE Xplore Digital Library
Author	Xiao Jin Mulnix, T. Planeta-Wilson, B. Gallezot, J.-D. Carson, R.E.
Copyright Year	2009
Description	Author affiliation: PET center, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA (Xiao Jin; Mulnix, T.; Planeta-Wilson, B.; Gallezot, J.-D.; Carson, R.E.)
Abstract	Motion correction in PET has become more important as system resolution has improved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three motion compensation methods, event-by-event motion compensation with list-mode reconstruction (MOLAR), frame-based motion correction, and post-reconstruction image registration. Motion compensated image reconstructions were carried out with simulated HRRT data, using a range of motion information based on human motion data. ROI analyses in high contrast regions were performed to evaluate the accuracy of all the motion compensation methods, with particular attention to within-frame motion. Our study showed that MOLAR with list-mode based motion correction using accurate motion data can reliably correct for all reasonable head motions. Over all motions, the average ROI count was within 0.1±4.2% and 0.7±0.9% of the reference, no-motion value for two different ROIs. The location of the ROI centroid was found to be within 0.7±0.3mm of that of the reference image for the raphe nucleus. Frame-based motion compensation and post-reconstruction image registration were able to correct for small (<5mm), but the ROI intensity begins to deteriorate for medium motions (5-10mm), especially for small brain structures such as the raphe nucleus. For large (>10mm) motions, the average centroid locations of the raphe nucleus ROI had an offset error of 1.5±1.8mm and 1.8±1.8mm for each of the frame-based methods. For each frame-based method, the decrease in the average ROI intensity was 16.9±4.3% and 20.2±9.9% respectively for the raphe nucleus, and was 5.5±2.2% and 7.4±0.2% for putamen. Based on these data, we conclude that event-by-event based motion correction works accurately for all reasonable motions, whereas frame-based motion correction is accurate only when the within-frame motion is less than 10mm.
Starting Page	3199
Ending Page	3202
File Size	377288
Page Count	4
File Format	PDF
ISBN	9781424439614
ISSN	10957863
DOI	10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5401706
Language	English
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Publisher Date	2009-10-24
Publisher Place	USA
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Rights Holder	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subject Keyword	Motion compensation Head Image reconstruction Image registration Positron emission tomography Humans Data analysis Image motion analysis Performance analysis Performance evaluation
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Estimation of rigid body motion parameters for the ECAT HRRT data without image reconstruction

Simultaneous reconstruction of image and motion in gated positron-emission-tomography

A hybrid 3D reconstruction/registration algorithm for correction of head motion in emission tomography

Joint Reconstruction of Image and Motion in Gated Positron Emission Tomography

Correction methods for missing data in sinograms of the HRRT PET scanner

Quantitative accuracy of HRRT lIST-MODE reconstructions: Effect of low statistics

Optimization transfer approach to joint registration / reconstruction for motion-compensated image reconstruction

Comparison of 3D-RP and 3D-OPOSEM reconstructions of the ECAT HRRT PET data

Gap Filling Strategies for 3-D-FBP Reconstructions of High-Resolution Research Tomograph Scans

Accuracy of head motion compensation for the HRRT: Comparison of methods

Similar Documents

Estimation of rigid body motion parameters for the ECAT HRRT data without image reconstruction

Simultaneous reconstruction of image and motion in gated positron-emission-tomography

A hybrid 3D reconstruction/registration algorithm for correction of head motion in emission tomography

Joint Reconstruction of Image and Motion in Gated Positron Emission Tomography

Correction methods for missing data in sinograms of the HRRT PET scanner

Quantitative accuracy of HRRT lIST-MODE reconstructions: Effect of low statistics

Optimization transfer approach to joint registration / reconstruction for motion-compensated image reconstruction

Comparison of 3D-RP and 3D-OPOSEM reconstructions of the ECAT HRRT PET data

Gap Filling Strategies for 3-D-FBP Reconstructions of High-Resolution Research Tomograph Scans

Accuracy of head motion compensation for the HRRT: Comparison of methods