NDLI: Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Income Tax Act 1961 notice u/s.148 accepted by ITAT appeal filed by the Revenue u/ s.260-A of the Act Objections raised
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Allowed
Headnote	Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss.260-A, 148 – Assessing officer (AO) issued notice to the respondent u/s.148 – Objections raised by the respondent were accepted by the ITAT – Aggrieved, Revenue filed appeal in the High Court – High Court dismissed the appeal in limine on the ground that it did not involve any substantial question of law within the meaning of s.260A of the Act – On appeal, held: The order of the High Court legally not sustainable – The following four questions need to be answered by the High Court on their respective merits while deciding the appeal filed by the Revenue u/ s.260-A of the Act – (i)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued by the AO u/s.148 was bad in law when admittedly the impugned notice was issued in the case where the assessment was made u/s.143(1) of the Act but not u/s.143(3) of the Act – (ii)Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act was bad because it was based on mere change of opinion by overlooking the fact that there was no foundation to form any such opinion – (iii) When admittedly the notice in question satisfied the requirements of s.148 of the Act as it stood, namely, that first, it contained the facts constituting the “reasons to believe” and second, it furnished the necessary details for assessing the escaped income of the assessee, whether the ITAT was still justified in declaring the notice as being bad in law without taking into consideration any of these admitted facts – (iv) In case, if the notice is held proper and legal, whether the finding recorded by the ITAT on the merits of the case on each item, which is subject matter of the notice, is legally sustainable – Thus, case remanded to the High Court for answering the aforementioned questions on merits in accordance with law.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre
Neutral Citation	2019 INSC 476
Petitioner	Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 6
Respondent	Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.
SCR	[2019] 6 S.C.R. 478
Judgement Date	2019-04-08
Case Number	3450

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

Please Log-in to view this content

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Khyati Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central 2 Vs. M/s A.a. Estate Pvt. Ltd.

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 Vs. M/s Yes Bank Ltd.

M/s Us Technologies International Pvt. Ltd Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax

R & B Falcon (a) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Vs. M/s I-ven Interactive Limited, Mumbai

Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. M/s Eli Lilly & Company (india) Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax 7 Vs. M/s Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta (central) Vs. M/s. Paharpur Cooling Towers Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Khyati Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central 2 Vs. M/s A.a. Estate Pvt. Ltd.

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 Vs. M/s Yes Bank Ltd.

M/s Us Technologies International Pvt. Ltd Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax

R & B Falcon (a) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Vs. M/s I-ven Interactive Limited, Mumbai

Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. M/s Eli Lilly & Company (india) Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax 7 Vs. M/s Paville Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta (central) Vs. M/s. Paharpur Cooling Towers Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 Vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.