NDLI: Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Punjab State Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Recruitment Regulations 1965:
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Allowed
Headnote	Punjab State Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Recruitment Regulations, 1965: Time bound benefit – PSEB passed an office order on 19.07.1989 for regular employees introducing a scheme to allow a time bound benefit of higher scale on their completion of 9/16 years of services – On 29.03.1991, another office order was passed upgrading 20% of the cadre posts of Junior Engineer-II (Civil) in the scale of Rs.1640/3200 (revised) to that of Junior Engineer-I (Civil) in the scale of 1800/3500 w.e.f. 01.01.1986 – Thereafter, in continuation, consolidation and supersession of orders dated 19.07.1989 and 29.03.1991, the PSEB issued office order dated 23.04.1990 introducing scheme to allow “time bound benefit of promotional scales” after completion of 9/16 years of regular service in PSEB w.e.f. 01.01.1986 subject to certain conditions – Respondents (original petitioners) in the writ petition prayed for granting the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4250 with initial start of Rs. 2400/- per month with effect from 01.01.1986 and further to grant the pay scale of Rs. 3000-5600 on completion of 16 years of their services on the basis of office orders dated 19.07.1989, 29.03.1990 and 23.04.1990, however made no challenge to office order dated 29.03.1990 in the petition, which was held to be unenforceable by the High Court on the ground that it was not published in the Gazette as required under s.79 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 – Contention raised by the respondents was that office order dated 29.03.1990 was issued in the disguise of upgrading the respondents posts, which in fact was issued for creating new posts of promotion, so as to deprive the respondents the benefit of office order dated 23.04.1990; that issuance of such order was changing the conditions of service of the respondents and, therefore, the same was required to be published in the gazette as required under s.79 of the 1948 Act – Held: Office order dated 29.03.1990, which was issued only for upgrading 20% of the postsof Junior Engineer-II (Civil), in the higher pay scale, could neither be construed as creating new posts of promotion nor could it be construed as changing the conditions of service of the Junior Engineers (Civil) – The said upgradation merely conferred a financial benefit by raising the pay scale of the Junior Engineers (Civil), without there being advancement to a higher position, and without there being change in the duties and responsibilities – There was also nothing on record to suggest that the Junior Engineers had to undergo any process of selection for getting the benefit of the said office order – Hence, it could not be said that the PSEB had robbed the respondents of their legitimate right of promotion by issuing the said office order or that such order could not have been issued without corresponding amendment in the Regulations – In view of Regulation 17 of the said Regulations, the PSEB was authorised to fix the scales of pay of the posts specified therein including that of the Junior Engineers, from time to time – PSEB having already framed the Regulations of 1965 in exercise of powers conferred under s.79(c) of the Act, and the Regulations having also been published in the Official Gazette, there was no need for the PSEB to notify office order dated 29.03.1990 – An employee could be said to be suffering from stagnation as per the office order dated 23.04.1990 only if he possessed the requisite qualification for the next higher post and was unable to get the higher post on account of non availability of such post – Thus, the claim of the respondents based on office order dated 23.04.1990, for getting the pay scale of the next higher post of Assistant Engineer i.e. Rs. 2200-4250 on the completion of 9 years of their service and the pay scale of another next higher post of the Executive Engineer i.e. Rs. 3000-5600 on the completion of 16 years of their service, without assuming the responsibilities of the said promotional posts, was misconceived. Service law: Upgradation and Promotion – Difference between – Held: There is a vast difference between the upgradation and the promotion – Ordinarily upgradation of a post would involve transfer of a post from lower to higher grade and placement of an incumbent of that post in the higher grade – Such placement would not involve any selection process to be followed, but would merely confer a financial benefit by raising the scale of pay of the post – However, in case of promotion, there would be an advancement to a higher position or rank along with an advancement to a highergrade – Therefore, the word “promotion” would mean advancement or preferment in honour, dignity, rank and grade.
Judge	Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
Neutral Citation	2021 INSC 773
Petitioner	Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr.
Respondent	Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.
SCR	[2021] 7 S.C.R. 547
Judgement Date	2021-11-23
Case Number	6995

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Please Log-in to view this content

Inderjit Singh Sodhi and Others Vs. The Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board and Another

U.p. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra and Anr.

Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. & Anr Vs. Rubfila International Limited & Ors.

Meghalaya State Electricity Board and Ors. Vs. Thuleswar Barbaruah & Ors.

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

Punjab State Electricity Board Now Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Raj Kumar Goel

Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board, Chandigarh & Ors.

Joginder Pal & Ors. Etc. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab State Electricity Board and Anr. Vs. V.n.sharma

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Inderjit Singh Sodhi and Others Vs. The Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board and Another

U.p. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra and Anr.

Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. & Anr Vs. Rubfila International Limited & Ors.

Meghalaya State Electricity Board and Ors. Vs. Thuleswar Barbaruah & Ors.

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited

Punjab State Electricity Board Now Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Raj Kumar Goel

Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board, Chandigarh & Ors.

Joginder Pal & Ors. Etc. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab State Electricity Board and Anr. Vs. V.n.sharma

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.