NDLI: Desh Raj Vs. Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Code of Civil Procedure
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Disposed Off
Headnote	Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or. VIII, r. 1 – Timeline for filing written statement in non-commercial disputes – Agreement to sell entered on 17.03.2017 between the appellant and the respondent, who are brothers, for sale of one floor of the ancestral property for Rs. 7.5 lakhs – Rs.1 lakh paid as earnest money to the appellant – Agreement not honoured – Respondent filed suit inter alia for specific performance – Appellant’s opportunity of filing written statement was closed and defence struck off owing to repeated delays and non-adherence of deadlines – High Court summarily dismissed the petition relying upon it’s order in one Oku Tech case which was rendered in the context of a commercial dispute qua Or.VIII, r.1 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Held: Counsel for the respondent has not contested the non-commercial nature of the dispute – Dispute does not fall within the parameters specified u/s.2(c) of the 2015 Act and in particular sub-clause (vii), as the immovable property here is not of a nature which is “used exclusively in trade or commerce”– High Court overlooked the nature of the dispute and mistakenly applied the ratio of a case rendered in light of modified version of the CPC applicable only to commercial disputes – Further, numerous opportunities were accorded to the appellant – He was served on 01.05.2017 – It was only on 02.11.2017, after delay of 95 days post the maximum extendable period under the Proviso of Or. VIII, r.1 that the appellant claimed to have filed his written statement – Only defence taken to the repeated and blatant lapses is that the appellant’s counsel was not turning up – Appellant is seeking condonation in a casual manner – This ought not to be permitted or encouraged – Although the unamended Or.VIII, r.1 is directory, it cannot be interpreted to bestow free hand to any litigant/lawyer to file written statement at their own sweet-will– Legislative objective behind prescription of timelines under the CPC must be given due weightage so that disputes are resolved in time-bound manner – Appellant failed to give or even attempt to proffer any cogent reason for the delay, though he is right that the High Court erroneously relied upon the ratio of Oku Tech – Lenient view taken in the unique circumstances of the case – Discretion exercised not a precedent – Written statement filed by the appellant on 02.11.2017 (as claimed), be taken on record with a copy to counsel for the respondent within one week from today, subject to payment of costs of Rs.25,000/- to the respondent – Orders of the courts below set aside – Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – ss.2(c) and 16. Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – ss.2(c) and 16 – Amendment of CPC in its application to commercial disputes – Held: Post coming into force of the said Act, there are two regimes of civil procedure wherein commercial disputes [as defined u/s.2(c) of the said Act] are governed by the CPC as amended by s.16 of the said Act; all other non-commercial disputes fall within the ambit of the unamended/original provisions of CPC – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or. VIII, r. 1.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai Honble Mr. Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
Neutral Citation	2020 INSC 59
Petitioner	Desh Raj
Respondent	Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini
SCR	[2020] 5 S.C.R. 14
Judgement Date	2020-01-20
Case Number	433

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Desh Raj Vs. Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini

Please Log-in to view this content

Shah Mansukhlal Chhaganlal (d) Through Lrs. Vs. Gohil Amarsing Govindbhai (d) Through Lrs.

Koppisetty Venkat Ratnam (d) Through Lrs. Vs. Pamarti Venkayamma

Parmanand Patel (d) By Lr. & Ors. Vs. Sudha A. Chowgule & Ors.

Inderchand Jain (d) Through L.rs. Vs. Motilal (d) Through L.rs.

Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik (dead) Through Lrs Vs. Bisaram and Others

Lakshmi Alias Bhagyalakshmi and Anr. Vs. E.jayaram (d) By Lr.

Jawala Singh (d) By Lrs. and Ors. Vs. Jagat Singh (d) By Lrs. and Ors.

V.ramaswamy Vs. Ramachandran & Anr

M/s Prime Properties Vs. Sana Lakshmi Devi (died) Through Her Lrs. & Ors.

Desh Raj Vs. Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini

Desh Raj Vs. Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Shah Mansukhlal Chhaganlal (d) Through Lrs. Vs. Gohil Amarsing Govindbhai (d) Through Lrs.

Koppisetty Venkat Ratnam (d) Through Lrs. Vs. Pamarti Venkayamma

Parmanand Patel (d) By Lr. & Ors. Vs. Sudha A. Chowgule & Ors.

Inderchand Jain (d) Through L.rs. Vs. Motilal (d) Through L.rs.

Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik (dead) Through Lrs Vs. Bisaram and Others

Lakshmi Alias Bhagyalakshmi and Anr. Vs. E.jayaram (d) By Lr.

Jawala Singh (d) By Lrs. and Ors. Vs. Jagat Singh (d) By Lrs. and Ors.

V.ramaswamy Vs. Ramachandran & Anr

M/s Prime Properties Vs. Sana Lakshmi Devi (died) Through Her Lrs. & Ors.

Desh Raj Vs. Balkishan (d) Through Proposed Lr Ms. Rohini