Content Provider | Supreme Court of India |
---|---|
e-ISSN | 30484839 |
Language | English |
Access Restriction | NDLI |
Subject Keyword | Registration Act |
Content Type | Text |
Resource Type | Law Judgement |
Jurisdiction | India |
Act(s) Referred | Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) |
Case(s) Referred | Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4 Referred Case 5 Referred Case 6 Referred Case 7 Referred Case 8 Referred Case 9 |
Case Type | Appeal |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Disposal Nature | Appeal Allowed |
Headnote | Registration Act, 1908 – s. 17 – Document of family settlement– The predecessor of the appellants asserted that his ownershipand possession in respect of the suit land comprising Khasra No.935/1 and 935/2 including constructions thereon of 16 shops, aservice station and a boundary wall with Samadhi of his wife in theland, was accepted and acknowledged by his two brothers in afamily settlement – However, dispute arose between predecessor ofthe appellants and his brothers regarding the suit land – Thereafter,a memorandum of family settlement dated 10.03.1988 was executedbetween the parties – The brothers of the predecessor of theappellants, however, again raised new issues to resile from the familyarrangement – As a result, a suit was filed by plaintiff/predecessorof the appellants against his brothers, original defendant nos. 1 &2 for a declaration that he was the exclusive owner of the suit land– The trial Court decreed the suit partly in favour of the plaintiff –However, the First Appellate Court declared the plaintiff as the ownerof the suit land – The First Appellate Court also held that thedocument dated 10.03.1988 was indisputably executed by the partiesand the said document was merely a memorandum of familysettlement and not a document containing terms and recitals of thefamily settlement made thereunder – Being a memorandum of familysettlement, it was not required to be registered – In the second appeal,the High Court set aside the conclusion recorded by the FirstAppellate Court and opined that the document which for the firsttime create a right in favour of plaintiff in an immovable propertyin which he has no pre-existing right would require registration,being the mandate of law – Accordingly, the High Court restoredthe decree passed by the trial Court – On appeal, held: TheJamabandi for the year 1984-85 of the property in dispute revealsthat Khasra No. 935/1/1/1 (5-19) shows name of original defendantnos. 1 & 2 as owners, whereas the name of plaintiff is shown againstkhasra No. 935/1/1/2 (5-18) as owner – Although the ownership ofthe suit property recorded in Jamabandi is of the concerneddefendant, the plaintiff had carried constructed thereupon and wasin possession – The possession of the plaintiff is admitted and hecame in possession with the consent of his brothers – Notably, thisfinding has not been disturbed by the High Court – That apart, it isalso established from records that a plot in the name of plaintiffwas given to original defendant no. 2, which was otherwise inpossession of original defendant no. 1 – Further, a plot purchasedby the plaintiff in the name of his son was given to original defendantno. 1 and his wife – These facts clearly establish that there was notonly univocal family arrangement between the parties, but it wasacted upon by them without any exception – Now, it was not open toresile from the same – They were estopped from contending to thecontrary – The High Court committed manifest error in interferingwith and in particular reversing the well-considered decision of theFirst Appellate Court, which had justly concluded that the documentdated 10.03.1988 was merely a memorandum of family settlement,and it did not require registration – Therefore, impugned judgmentand decree of the High Court is set aside – The judgment and decreepassed by the First Appellate Court is restored in favour of theplaintiff (appellants). |
Judge | Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar |
Neutral Citation | 2019 INSC 869 |
Petitioner | Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. |
Respondent | Manjit Kaur & Ors. |
SCR | [2020] 8 S.C.R. 1138 |
Judgement Date | 2020-07-31 |
Case Number | 7764 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |