NDLI: Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2) Vs. M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Income Tax Act 1961 – s.147
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Dismissed
Headnote	Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.147 – Scope of – Held: s.147 empowers the Assessing authority to re-assess any income on the ground which was not brought on record during the original proceedings and escaped his knowledge; and the said fact would have material bearing on the outcome of the relevant assessment order – In the instant case, assessee declared its income from two sources, namely software development and human resource development but claimed expenses commonly for both – Notice was issued to show cause as to why the expenses claimed with regard to the allocation of common expenses between the two heads did not reveal any basis of such allocation – The notice which was issued in the original assessment proceedings under s.143 show that the point on which the re-assessment proceedings were initiated, was well considered in the original proceedings – In fact, the very basis of issuing the show cause notice was that the assessee was not maintaining any separate books of account for the said two categories and the details filed did not reveal proportional allocation of common expenses be made to these categories – Even the said show cause notice suggested how proportional allocation should be done – All these things led to an unavoidable conclusion that the question as to how and to what extent deduction should be allowed under s.10A was well considered in the original assessment proceedings itself – Hence, initiation of the re-assessment proceedings under s.147 by issuing a notice under s.148 merely because of the fact that now the Assessing Officer is of the view that the deduction under s.10A was allowed in excess, was based on nothing but a change of opinion on the same facts and circumstances which were already in his knowledge even during the original assessment proceedings – High Court was right in setting aside the show cause notice as well as the re-assessment order. Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.147 – Reassessment proceedings – Held: The use of the words ‘reason to believe’ in s.147 has to be interpreted schematically as the liberal interpretation of the word would have the consequence of conferring arbitrary powers on the assessing officer who may even initiate such re-assessment proceedings merely on his change of opinion on the basis of same facts and circumstances which has already been considered by him during the original assessment proceedings. Words and Phrases – ‘change of opinion’ – Meaning of – Held: The word change of opinion implies formulation of opinion and then a change thereof – In terms of assessment proceedings, it means formulation of belief by an assessing officer resulting from what he thinks on a particular question – It is a result of understanding, experience and reflection.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal
Neutral Citation	2018 INSC 396
Petitioner	Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2)
Respondent	M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.
SCR	[2018] 4 S.C.R. 328
Judgement Date	2018-04-24
Case Number	2732

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2) Vs. M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Income Tax Officer & Ors. Vs. M/s. Madnani Engineering Works Ltd., Calcutta

Gvk Industries Ltd. &anr. Vs. The Income Tax Officer &anr.

M/s. Maharana Mills (private) Ltd. Vs. The Income-tax Officer, Porbandar

Income Tax Officer, L Ward, Dist. Vi, Calcutta & Ors. Vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das

M/s Synco Industries Ltd. Vs. Assessing Officer, Income Tax, Mumbai & Anr.

Income Tax Officer, Jodhpur Vs. Purushottam Das Bangur and Anr.

Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Circle-1, Ward A, Rajkot, Gujarat

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Vs. M/s Bilahari Investment (p) Ltd.

Vls Finance Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2) Vs. M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2) Vs. M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Income Tax Officer & Ors. Vs. M/s. Madnani Engineering Works Ltd., Calcutta

Gvk Industries Ltd. &anr. Vs. The Income Tax Officer &anr.

M/s. Maharana Mills (private) Ltd. Vs. The Income-tax Officer, Porbandar

Income Tax Officer, L Ward, Dist. Vi, Calcutta & Ors. Vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das

M/s Synco Industries Ltd. Vs. Assessing Officer, Income Tax, Mumbai & Anr.

Income Tax Officer, Jodhpur Vs. Purushottam Das Bangur and Anr.

Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Circle-1, Ward A, Rajkot, Gujarat

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Vs. M/s Bilahari Investment (p) Ltd.

Vls Finance Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16 (2) Vs. M/s Techspan India Private Ltd. & Anr.