NDLI: M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Matter pertaining to default in payment of outstanding SARFASI Writ Jurisdiction of High Court under
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (54 of 2002)
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Disposed Off
Headnote	Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002:Writ Jurisdiction of High Court under – Matter pertaining to default in payment of outstanding dues by the borrowers – Issuance of notices u/s. 13(4) – Writ petitions by the borrowers challenging the notices before the High Court – Debt Recovery tribunal was not functional at the time when said writ petitions were filed– However, became so from the month of March 2022 – Meanwhile, in an SLP, order passed by this Court to transfer the pending matters to the concerned tribunals when they start functioning with their respective Presiding Officers duly in-charge – Notwithstanding the said order, the High Court took upon itself to decide the said petitions and allowed the borrower to make deferred payment in 12 months – Appeal before this Court – Appellant’s case that the relief granted by the High Court may not be disturbed while pressing for reiteration of law which might guide the High Court in not entertaining such writ petitions in the future – Held: In view of the fair stand of the appellant, the relief granted by the High Court not to be disturbed – Powers conferred under Article 226 are rather wide but are required to be exercised only in extraordinary circumstances – In matters where the legislature has provided for a specific mechanism for appropriate redressal, constitutional remedy not to be resorted to – Constitution of India – Art. 226.SARFAESI Act – Purpose and Object – Discussed.Writ: Writ of certiorari – Issuance of, when – Held: Is to be issued over a decision when the Court finds that the process does not conform to the law or statute – Writ is not to be issued to remedy all violations – Writ court cannot substitute itself with the decision-making authority while finding fault with the process – When a tribunal is constituted,it is expected to determine issues of fact and law, including a statutory violation – Constitution of India – Art. 226. Writ of mandamus – Issuance of – Writ petition before the High Court in commercial matters against the private individual seeking issuance of mandamus – Held: Writ of Mandamus is a prerogative writ – In the absence of any legal right, the Court cannot exercise the said power – More circumspection is required in a financial transaction, particularly when one of the parties would not come within the purview of Art. 12. Judicial deprecation: Interference of the High Courts in matters pertaining to the SARFAESI Act – Held: Said practice is deprecated – Request to the High Courts not to entertain such cases – When a statute prescribes a particular mode, an attempt to circumvent shall not be encouraged by a writ court – A litigant cannot avoid the non-compliance of approaching the tribunal which requires the prescription of fees and use the constitutional remedy as an alternative – Constitution of India – Article 226. Judicial notice: Commercial matters, where an effective and efficacious alternative forum has been constituted through a statute – Interference by certain High Court invoking Art. 226 in such matters leading to a regular supply of cases before this Court – Judicial notice taken by this Court.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
Neutral Citation	2023 INSC 379
Petitioner	M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Respondent	Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.
SCR	[2023] 4 S.C.R. 18
Judgement Date	2023-02-17
Case Number	2861

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.

Please Log-in to view this content

The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank Vs. D. Visalakshi and Anr.

Jose Philip Mampillil Vs. M/s. Premier Automobiles Ltd. and Anr.

M/s. Optiemus Infracom Ltd. Etc. Vs. M/s. Ishan Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr Vs. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc

State of Himachal Pradesh and Others Vs. M/s A.j. Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd and Anr.

M/s Raymond Ltd. and Anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors.

Authorized Officer, Indian Overseas Bank and Anr. Vs. M/s. Ashok Saw Mill

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. A.r.chacko

M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.

M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank Vs. D. Visalakshi and Anr.

Jose Philip Mampillil Vs. M/s. Premier Automobiles Ltd. and Anr.

M/s. Optiemus Infracom Ltd. Etc. Vs. M/s. Ishan Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr Vs. Prasad Vassudev Keni, Etc. Etc

State of Himachal Pradesh and Others Vs. M/s A.j. Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd and Anr.

M/s Raymond Ltd. and Anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors.

Authorized Officer, Indian Overseas Bank and Anr. Vs. M/s. Ashok Saw Mill

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. A.r.chacko

M/s South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. Etc. Etc.