NDLI: “It’s hard to say anything definitive about what severity really is”: lay conceptualisations of severity in a healthcare context

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Stenmarck, Mille Sofie Whitehurst, David GT Lurås, Hilde Rugkåsa, Jorun
Abstract	Background Demand for healthcare outweighs available resources, making priority setting a critical issue. ‘Severity’ is a priority-setting criterion in many healthcare systems, including in Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. However, there is a lack of consensus on what severity means in a healthcare context, both in the academic literature and in policy. Further, while public preference elicitation studies demonstrate support for severity as a relevant concern in priority setting, there is a paucity of research on what severity is taken to mean for the public. The purpose of this study is to explore how severity is conceptualised by members of the general public. Methods Semi-structured group interviews were conducted from February to July 2021 with members of the Norwegian adult public (n = 59). These were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis, incorporating inductive and deductive elements. Results Through the analysis we arrived at three interrelated main themes. Severity as subjective experience included perceptions of severity as inherently subjective and personal. Emphasis was on the individual’s unique insight into their illness, and there was a concern that the assessment of severity should be fair for the individual. The second theme, Severity as objective fact, included perceptions of severity as something determined by objective criteria, so that a severe condition is equally severe for any person. Here, there was a concern for determining severity fairly within and across patient groups. The third theme, Severity as situation dependent, included perceptions of severity centered on second-order effects of illness. These included effects on the individual, such as their ability to work and enjoy their hobbies, effects on those surrounding the patient, such as next of kin, and effects at a societal level, such as production loss. We also identified a concern for determining severity fairly at a societal level. Conclusions Our findings suggest that severity is a polyvalent notion with different meanings attached to it. There seems to be a dissonance between lay conceptualisations of severity and policy operationalisations of the term, which may lead to miscommunications between members of the public and policymakers.
Related Links	https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12913-024-10892-6.pdf
Ending Page	13
Page Count	13
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14726963
DOI	10.1186/s12913-024-10892-6
Journal	BMC Health Services Research
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	24
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2024-04-19
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Public Health Health Administration Health Informatics Nursing Research Priority setting Health policy Severity Thematic analysis Views of the public
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Health Policy

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting

What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?

Policy levers and priority-setting in universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of healthcare financing agenda setting in Kenya

What do District Health Planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for Reasonableness'?

It’s hard to play ball: A qualitative study of knowledge exchange and silo effects in public health

Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study

Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting

Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis

Public participation: healthcare rationing in the newspaper media

“It’s hard to say anything definitive about what severity really is”: lay conceptualisations of severity in a healthcare context

Similar Documents

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting

What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?

Policy levers and priority-setting in universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of healthcare financing agenda setting in Kenya

What do District Health Planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for Reasonableness'?

It’s hard to play ball: A qualitative study of knowledge exchange and silo effects in public health

Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study

Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting

Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis

Public participation: healthcare rationing in the newspaper media

“It’s hard to say anything definitive about what severity really is”: lay conceptualisations of severity in a healthcare context