Content Provider | Supreme Court of India |
---|---|
e-ISSN | 30484839 |
Language | English |
Access Restriction | NDLI |
Subject Keyword | Reserve Bank Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act |
Content Type | Text |
Resource Type | Law Judgement |
Jurisdiction | India |
Act(s) Referred | Constitution of India Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (17 of 1961) |
Case(s) Referred | Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4 Referred Case 5 Referred Case 6 |
Case Type | Appeal |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Disposal Nature | Appeal Dismissed |
Headnote | Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: s.31(1), second and third provisos and s.31(2) read with s.49(7 A)(i), proviso - Supersession of Board of Directors of District Co-operative Bank - Without prior consultation with RBI . Held: When an authority invested with the power purports to act on its own but in substance the power is exercised by external guidance or pressure, it would amount to non-exercise of power, statutorily vested - In the instant case, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Joint Registrar was acting under extraneous influence and under dictation - Order of supersession is not only in clear violation of second proviso to s.53(1), but also allegations raised in show cause notice are deficiencies mostly relating to systems and procedures and are of general nature and not grave enough to overthrow a democratically elected Board of Directors - Board of Directors was superseded illegally, and, therefore, in view of proviso to s. 49(7 A)(i), they need to be put back in-office and allowed to continue for the period they were put out of office - Ordered accordingly - Costs imposed on State Government and officer concerned - Legislation - Legislative intent. s.31 (1) second proviso - Expression 'previous consultation with the Reserve Bank' - Connotation of - Held: Previous consultation is a condition precedent before forming an opinion by Joint Registrar to supersede the Board of Directors or not - Mere serving a copy of show cause notice on RBI with supporting documents is not what is contemplated under second proviso to s. 53(1) - For a meaningful and effective consultation, copy of reply filed by Bank to various charges and a/legations levelled against them should also be made available to RBI as well as the action proposed by Joint Registrar, after examining the reply submitted by Bank - Only then, there will be on effective consultation and views expressed by RBI will be a relevant material for deciding whether elected Board be superseded or not - In addition to six propositions laid down in the case of Indian Administrative Services (SCS) Association, U.P., one more proposition that may be added is that when the outcome of proposed action is to oust a democratically elected body, previous consultation with RBI is to be construed as mandatory. Constitution of India, 1950: Art. 226 - Writ petition - Alternative remedy - Held: In the instant case, Division Bench of High Court has rightly exercised its jurisdiction under Art. 226 and the alternative remedy of appeal is no bar in exercising that jurisdiction, since the order passed by Joint Registrar was arbitrary and in clear violation of second proviso to s.53(1) of the Act - Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - s. 78.Co-operative Societies: Supersession of elected bodies - Held: Co-operative philosophy on society must rest on free universal association, democratically governed and conditioned by equity and personal liberty - Registrar/Joint Registrar, while exercising power of supersession has to form an opinion and that opinion must be based on some objective criteria, which has nexus with final decision and he is bound to follow judicial precedents - The manner in which State Government took so much interest by spending huge public money pursuing the matter upto Supreme Court, that too without following bindingprecedents of High Court, deprecated - In view of mushrooming of cases in various courts challenging orders of supersession of elected committees, general directions given - Precedent - Judicial deprecation. |
Judge | Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan |
Neutral Citation | 2013 INSC 347 |
Petitioner | State Of M.p. And Others |
Respondent | Sanjay Nagayach And Others |
SCR | [2013] 3 S.C.R. 738 |
Judgement Date | 2013-05-16 |
Case Number | 4691 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |