NDLI: The State of Assam and Others Vs. Binod Kumar and Others

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Assam Police Manual Annual Confidential Report IPS Service law
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Police Act, 1861 (5 of 1861)
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Dismissed
Headnote	Issue for Consideration Rule 63(iii) of the Assam Police Manual, which dates back to a point of time when the Police Act, 1861, was in force, can be said to be still valid and lawful in the framework of the Assam Police Act, 2007 and the 2007 Rules relating to preparation of ACRs/ APARs of IPS Officers in the rank of Superintendents of Police .Service law – Assam Police Manual – r. 63(iii) – Assam Police Act, 2007 – s. 14(2) – Reporting Authority, entitled to initiate Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs)/Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs) of Indian Police Service (IPS) Officers working as District Superintendents of Police (SPs) in the State of Assam – Assessment initiated by the Deputy Commissioner, as the ‘Reporting Authority’, if lawful – r. 63(iii), if violative of s. 14(2): Held: 1970 Rules/2007 Rules define reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities to mean that they must all be from the same service or department, intervention by the Deputy Commissioner during the exercise of performance assessment of SPs of the districts in the State of Assam, by virtue of r. 63(iii), cannot be accepted, being in direct conflict therewith, and would tantamount to permitting the Deputy Commissioner to interfere with the internal organization of the police force, which would be contrary to the mandate of s.14(2) – It cannot be said that the Deputy Commissioner is the most suitable person to assess the performance of the SP, as he works under his control and direction – Clause 6 in r. 3 relating to appraisal by the ‘Reporting Authority’, Law and Order is only one of the twenty named domains within the purview of the Deputy Commissioner, thus, the Deputy Commissioner would not even be competent to assess the overall performance of the SP – Furthermore, the Circular issued by the Government of India stipulated that the ‘Reporting Authority’ should be in a higher grade of pay than the officer reported upon – State Governments must ensure that a member of the service does not initiate the Confidential Report of another member of the service in the same grade of pay – Thus, r. 63(iii) does not fit in with the scheme obtaining under the 1970 Rules and the 2007 Rules – Conclusion by the High Court, that the r. 63(iii) which prescribes that such assessment should be initiated by the Deputy Commissioner concerned, as the ‘Reporting Authority’ is invalid on the ground that it is in direct conflict with s.14(2), is upheld – Circular No. 11059/4/89-AIS.III, dated 28.12.1990. [Paras 16, 18, 19, 23, 25-27].Assam Police Act, 2007 – s. 14(1) and (2) – Harmonious construction of the provisions: Held: On a plain reading, s. 14(1) and s. 14(2) appear to be in derogation of each other, inasmuch as s.14(1) vests the Deputy Commissioner with control over the SP but s. 14(2) makes it clear that such control would not extend to the Deputy Commissioner interfering with the internal organization or discipline within the police force in the district – These provisions must be harmoniously construed by restricting the power vesting in the Deputy Commissioner u/s. 14(1), by duly carving out what has been excepted u/s. 14(2) – Such harmonious construction necessary to give effect to both provisions, so that they operate without conflict. [Para 21].
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar
Neutral Citation	2024 INSC 44
Petitioner	The State Of Assam And Others
Respondent	Binod Kumar And Others
SCR	[2024] 1 S.C.R. 473
Judgement Date	2024-01-18
Case Number	1933

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

The State of Assam and Others Vs. Binod Kumar and Others

Please Log-in to view this content

Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.

State of Haryana Vs. Shri P.c. Wadhwa, Ips Inspector General of Police & Anr.

Sri M.a. Rajasekhar Vs. The State of Karnataka.and Anr.

Dev Dutt Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Ajay Kumar Bhyan and Ors. Vs. State of Orissa and Ors.

Vinay Kumar Verma and Others Vs. The State of Bihar and Others

Union of India and Anr. Vs. S.k. Goel and Ors.

Kumod Kumar &another Vs. State of Jharkhand & Others

Alok Kumar Pandit Vs. State of Assam & Ors.

The State of Assam and Others Vs. Binod Kumar and Others

The State of Assam and Others Vs. Binod Kumar and Others

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.

State of Haryana Vs. Shri P.c. Wadhwa, Ips Inspector General of Police & Anr.

Sri M.a. Rajasekhar Vs. The State of Karnataka.and Anr.

Dev Dutt Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Ajay Kumar Bhyan and Ors. Vs. State of Orissa and Ors.

Vinay Kumar Verma and Others Vs. The State of Bihar and Others

Union of India and Anr. Vs. S.k. Goel and Ors.

Kumod Kumar &another Vs. State of Jharkhand & Others

Alok Kumar Pandit Vs. State of Assam & Ors.

The State of Assam and Others Vs. Binod Kumar and Others