NDLI: Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Kan, YaNan Bao, YunChun Ye, Fuying
Abstract	Background Patients with end-stage haemophilic arthritis (HA) are often hesitant about joint replacement surgery, yet little is known about the decision experiences faced by these patients. The aim of this study was to better understand the experiences faced by patients with HA when making decisions about joint replacement surgery and to provide a reference for health care professionals in the development of decision-making aids. Methods Fifteen HA patients who were candidates for joint replacement surgery at a tertiary and first-class hospital in Zhejiang Province were interviewed using a semistructured in-depth interview from January to December 2023. Colaizzi's seven-step method was used to analyse the data and refine the themes. Results The decision experience for patients with HA regarding joint replacement surgery can be summarized into four themes: decision information conflict, decision support conflict, self-perceived conflict, and self-developmental conflict. Conclusion Patients with HA face numerous decision conflicts. Health care professionals should develop joint replacement surgery decision-making aids suitable for patients with HA as soon as possible to reduce the decision conflict. Trial registration The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China (registration date: September 22, 2023; registration number: 2023-KLS-294–01).
Related Links	https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12911-025-02901-3.pdf
Ending Page	9
Page Count	9
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14726947
DOI	10.1186/s12911-025-02901-3
Journal	BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	25
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2025-02-04
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Health Informatics Information Systems and Communication Service Management of Computing and Information Systems Haemophilia Arthritis Decision conflict Qualitative study
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Health Informatics Computer Science Applications Health Policy
Journal Impact Factor	3.3/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	3.9/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Experiences and needs of older patients with stroke in China involved in rehabilitation decision-making: a qualitative study

Correction to: Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis

Qualitative study of willingness and demand for participation in decision-making regarding anticoagulation therapy in patient undergoing heart valve replacement

The considerations, experiences and support needs of family members making treatment decisions for patients admitted with major stroke: a qualitative study

Usability testing of ANSWER: a web-based methotrexate decision aid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis

Paramedic perceptions of decision-making when managing mental health-related presentations: a qualitative study

Multiple constraints compromise decision-making about implantable medical devices for individual patients: qualitative interviews with physicians

Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study

Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study

Similar Documents

Experiences and needs of older patients with stroke in China involved in rehabilitation decision-making: a qualitative study

Correction to: Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis

Qualitative study of willingness and demand for participation in decision-making regarding anticoagulation therapy in patient undergoing heart valve replacement

The considerations, experiences and support needs of family members making treatment decisions for patients admitted with major stroke: a qualitative study

Usability testing of ANSWER: a web-based methotrexate decision aid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis

Paramedic perceptions of decision-making when managing mental health-related presentations: a qualitative study

Multiple constraints compromise decision-making about implantable medical devices for individual patients: qualitative interviews with physicians

Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study

Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study