NDLI: Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison

Content Provider	PubMed Central
Author	Beller, Sieghard Singmann, Henrik Lisa, Hüther Bender, Andrea
Copyright Year	2015
Abstract	When referring to an object in relation to another, speakers of many languages can adopt a relative frame of reference (FoR). Following Levinson (2003), this kind of FoR can be established by projecting an observer's perspective onto the ground object either by translation, reflection, or rotation. So far, research on spatial FoRs has largely ignored the extent of variation in which of these projections are preferred generally, and specifically what kind of FoR is established for spatial arrays in one's back. This may seem justified by assumptions on “natural” preferences: for reflection in frontal settings (Canonical Encounter Hypothesis), and for converting dorsal into frontal situations by a turn of the observer before a reference is made (Turn Hypothesis). We scrutinize these assumptions by comparing the FoRs adopted for small-scale, static spatial arrays by speakers of four languages (German, US-English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan). Addressing the problem of inherent ambiguities on the item level when assessing FoRs from spatial prepositions, we use a multinomial processing tree (MPT) model for estimating probabilities of referencing strategies across sets of items. Substantial differences in frontal settings, both between and within languages, disprove the Canonical Encounter Hypothesis—translation occurs as frequently as reflection across samples. In dorsal settings, in contrast, the same type of response dominates in all samples. We suggest that this response is produced by a backward projection of the observer's coordinate system in correspondence with the two main FoR preferences for frontal settings. However, none of these strategies involves a turn of the observer, thus also disproving the Turn Hypothesis. In conclusion, we discuss possible causes of the observed variability, explore links between the domains of space and time, and reflect the relation between language, communication, and culture.
Related Links	http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01283
Starting Page	1283
File Format	PDF
ISSN	16641078
e-ISSN	16641078
Journal	Frontiers in Psychology
Volume Number	6
Language	English
Publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
Publisher Date	2015-09-01
Access Restriction	Open
Rights Holder	Frontiers Media S.A.
Subject Keyword	Research in Higher Education
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison

Shifting backward to say what’s front? Spatial referencing of dorsal objectarrangements

Spelling Acquisition in English and Italian: A Cross-Linguistic Study

Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis

The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: an ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison

A Look Back at “Where Have All the Behaviorists Gone?”

Spatial Position in Language and Visual Memory: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison

Dutch and English toddlers' use of linguistic cues in predicting upcoming turn transitions

Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis

Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison

Similar Documents

Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison

Shifting backward to say what’s front? Spatial referencing of dorsal objectarrangements

Spelling Acquisition in English and Italian: A Cross-Linguistic Study

Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis

The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: an ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison

A Look Back at “Where Have All the Behaviorists Gone?”

Spatial Position in Language and Visual Memory: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison

Dutch and English toddlers' use of linguistic cues in predicting upcoming turn transitions

Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis

Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison