Content Provider | Supreme Court of India |
---|---|
e-ISSN | 30484839 |
Language | English |
Access Restriction | NDLI |
Subject Keyword | Presumptions under Negotiable Instruments Act |
Content Type | Text |
Resource Type | Law Judgement |
Jurisdiction | India |
Case Type | Appeal |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Disposal Nature | Appeal Dismissed |
Headnote | Issue for Consideration: Appellant-accused convicted u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, had claimed mismatch of signatures on the cheque in question. His application for comparison of the signature as appearing on the cheque through the handwriting expert was rejected by trial court. High Court whether justified in dismissing the application filed by the appellant u/s.391, CrPC for taking additional evidence at appellate stage and seeking a direction to obtain the opinion of the handwriting expert.Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – ss.118, 138 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.391 – Presumptions under the NI Act though rebuttable, operate in favour of the complainant – Accused to rebut such presumptions by leading evidence – Cheque dishonoured – Appellant convicted for offence punishable u/s.138 – Claiming mismatch of signatures, during the trial, the appellant had filed application seeking comparison of the signature as appearing on the cheque through the handwriting expert – Rejected by trial court – Order not challenged – At appellate stage, the appellant filed application u/s.391, CrPC for taking additional evidence and seeking a direction to obtain the opinion of the handwriting expert – Dismissed: Held: s.118 sub-clause (e) provides a clear presumption regarding indorsements made on the negotiable instrument being in order in which they appear thereupon – Thus, the presumption of the indorsements on the cheque being genuine operates in favour of the holder in due course of the cheque in question which would be the complainant herein – If the accused intends to rebut such presumption, he would be required to lead evidence to this effect – Certified copy of a document issued by a Bank is itself admissible under the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891 without any formal proof thereof – Hence, in an appropriate case, the certified copy of the specimen signature maintained by the Bank can be procured with a request to the Court to compare the same with the signature appearing on the cheque by exercising powers u/s.73, Evidence Act, 1872 – However, in the present case, despite having opportunity, the appellant did not put any question to the bank official examined in defence for establishing his plea of purported mismatch of signature on the cheque in question – Hence, the appellate Court was not required to come to the aid and assistance of the appellant for collecting defence evidence at his behest – Power to record additional evidence u/s.391, CrPC should only be exercised when the party making such request was prevented from presenting the evidence in the trial despite due diligence or the facts giving rise to such prayer came to light at a later stage during pendency of the appeal and non-recording of such evidence may lead to failure of justice – Furthermore, the appellant also did not challenge the trial court’s order rejecting his application for comparison of the signature as appearing on the cheque through the handwriting expert and thus, had attained finality – Impugned orders do not warrant interference. [Paras 14, 15, 17, 9, 18 and 20] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.391 – Power to record additional evidence – Exercise of – Discussed. [Para 9] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.391 – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – s.138 – Appellant-accused alleged that he did not receive the notice u/s.138 of the NI Act and the concerned officer from the Post Office be summoned to prove the same: Held: It would be for the appellate Court while deciding the appeal to examine such issue based on the evidence available on record – Thus, there was no requirement for the appellate Court to have exercised power u/s.391, CrPC for summoning the official from the Post Office and it rightly rejected the application u/s.391, CrPC. [Para 19] |
Judge | Honble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta |
Neutral Citation | 2024 INSC 63 |
Petitioner | Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod |
Respondent | State Of Gujarat & Anr. |
SCR | [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1083 |
Judgement Date | 2024-01-29 |
Case Number | 478 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |