NDLI: State of U.p. Vs. Veerpal & Anr.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Evidence Act 1872 – s.32
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3 Referred Case 4 Referred Case 5 Referred Case 6 Referred Case 7 Referred Case 8
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Allowed
Headnote	Evidence Act, 1872 – s.32 – Dying declaration – Appreciation of – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate in which deceased specifically stated that due to feud over demand of money, respondents-accused burnt her after pouring kerosene over her – On facts, no reason to doubt the dying declaration recorded by the magistrate – Statements in the dying declaration consistent with medical evidence inasmuch as there were no injuries on the chest and injuries were found only on the head and backside – Such injuries on the head and backside could have been possible only if somebody have poured kerosene on the deceased from behind – Evidentiary value of the dying declaration further enhanced by certificate by physician who treated the deceased prior to her death that at the time of making statements she was fully conscious – High Court erred in acquitting the accused – Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 r/w. s.34. Evidence – Dying declaration – Evidentiary Value- There can be conviction solely based upon the dying declaration without corroboration.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mukeshkumar Rasikbhai Shah
Neutral Citation	2022 INSC 133
Petitioner	State Of U.p.
Respondent	Veerpal & Anr.
SCR	[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163
Judgement Date	2022-02-01
Case Number	34

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

State of U.p. Vs. Veerpal & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Budhsen Vs. State of U.p.

Hari Nath and Anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.p.

Sher Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Bapu Vs. State of Maharashtra

Jadunath Singh & Anr. Vs. State of U.p.

Zafar Vs. State of U.p.

Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Betal Singh Vs. State of M.p.

J. Ramulu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

State of U.p. Vs. Veerpal & Anr.

State of U.p. Vs. Veerpal & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Budhsen Vs. State of U.p.

Hari Nath and Anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.p.

Sher Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Bapu Vs. State of Maharashtra

Jadunath Singh & Anr. Vs. State of U.p.

Zafar Vs. State of U.p.

Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Betal Singh Vs. State of M.p.

J. Ramulu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

State of U.p. Vs. Veerpal & Anr.