NDLI: Bedside teaching: specialists versus non-specialists.

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Year: 2017 Volume: 14

Year: 2016 Volume: 13

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 6

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 5

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 4

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Recruitment and retention of junior clinical teachers.

Confessions of a clinical teaching fellow.

Bedside teaching: specialists versus non-specialists.

Teaching telehealth consultation skills.

The PAUL Suit(©) : an experience of ageing.

Expanding aged care clinical education.

Test anxiety and United States Medical Licensing Examination scores.

Teaching the breast examination using critiques.

What kind of doctor would you like me to be?

Role-play as a learning modality in Pakistan.

Learning in underserved UK areas: a novel approach.

Exploring the potential of sequential simulation.

Role modelling in medical education: the importance of teaching skills.

The challenge of authenticity for medical students.

Empathy and the clinical teacher.

Developing and implementing a patient safety curriculum.

Integrating paediatrics into student assistantships.

Interprofessional mentorship for final-year medical students.

Response to Ten steps to health professional education research.

Year: 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Year: 2015 Volume: 12

Year: 2014 Volume: 11

Year: 2013 Volume: 10

Year: 2012 Volume: 9

Year: 2011 Volume: 8

Year: 2010 Volume: 7

Bedside teaching: specialists versus non-specialists.

Content Provider	World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus
Author	Woodley, Niall McKelvie, Karen Kellett, Catherine
Description	Country affiliation: United kingdom Author Affiliation: Woodley N ( Medical School, University of Dundee, UK.); McKelvie K ( Clinical Skills Department, University of Dundee Medical School, UK.); Kellett C ( Golden Jubilee National Hospital & University of Glasgow, UK.)
Abstract	BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BT) is a valuable learning experience for medical students. In 2010, the BT curriculum at the University of Dundee was revised so that clinical specialist doctors facilitated these sessions. The aim of this study was to compare student opinion of BT delivered by specialist and non-specialist doctors. METHODS: A retrospective survey was sent to two medical student year groups who received teaching delivered by either specialist or non-specialist doctors during year 2. RESULTS: The response rate was 24.5 per cent, of which 49.4 per cent were taught by specialists. Responses indicated that specialist doctors improved communication skills (p = 0.034), were less intimidating (p = 0.01) and gave greater opportunity to ask questions (p = 0.028) than their non-specialist counterparts. Overall, students taught by specialty doctors rated BT as more valuable (p < 0.001). A positive correlation was noted between the frequency of patient interaction and the overall value of BT (p < 0.0121); however, there was no significant association between the main teaching location and the overall value of BT. DISCUSSION: Findings indicate that specialist doctors provide students with a better understanding of disease processes. Several students from the specialist group noted that their tutors linked theory to practice. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding whether teaching was at an appropriate level. Specialist doctors therefore allow a number of improvements over the use of non-specialist doctors for BT. Overall, students taught by specialty doctors rated bedside teaching as more valuable.
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	17434971
Issue Number	2
Journal	The Clinical Teacher
Volume Number	13
e-ISSN	1743498X
Language	English
Publisher	Wiley-Blackwell
Publisher Date	2016-04-01
Publisher Place	Great Britain (UK)
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Discipline Clinical Competence
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Medicine Review and Exam Preparation

Central Library (ISO-9001:2015 Certified)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India | PIN - 721302

See location in the Map
03222 282435
Mail: support@ndl.gov.in

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in