NDLI: Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Jamili, Sara Yousefi, Mehdi pour, Hossein Ebrahimi Houshmand, Elahe Taghipour, Ali Tabatabaee, Seyed Saeed Adel, Amin
Abstract	Background Pay for performance (P4P) schemes provide financial incentives or facilities to health workers based on the achievement of predetermined performance goals. Various P4P programs have been implemented around the world. There is a question of which model is suitable for p4p implementation to achieve better results. The purpose of this study is to compare pay for performance models in different countries. Methods This is a descriptive-comparative study comparing the P4P model in selected countries in 2022. Data for each country are collected from reliable databases and are tabulated to compare their payment models. the standard framework of the P4P model is used for data analysis. Results we used the standard P4P model framework to compare pay for performance programs in the primary care sector of selected countries because this framework can demonstrate all the necessary features of payment programs, including performance domains and measures, basis for reward or penalty, nature of the reward or penalty, and data reporting. The results of this study show that although the principles of P4P are almost similar in the selected countries, the biggest difference is in the definition of performance domains and measures. Conclusions Designing an effective P4P program is very complex, and its success depends on a variety of factors, from the socioeconomic and cultural context and the healthcare goals of governments to the personal characteristics of the healthcare provider. considering these factors and the general framework of the features of P4P programs are critical to the success of the p4p design and implementation.
Related Links	https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12913-023-09841-6.pdf
Ending Page	11
Page Count	11
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14726963
DOI	10.1186/s12913-023-09841-6
Journal	BMC Health Services Research
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	23
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2023-08-14
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Public Health Health Administration Health Informatics Nursing Research Payment methods Pay-for-performance Primary care
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Health Policy

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review

A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes

Modelling the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pay-for-performance programs in health care

P4P in Australia

Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis

When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study

Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: from theory to practice

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research

Willingness to pay for physician services at a primary contact in Ukraine: results of a contingent valuation study

Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study

Similar Documents

Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review

A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes

Modelling the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pay-for-performance programs in health care

P4P in Australia

Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis

When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study

Incorporating shared savings programs into primary care: from theory to practice

Improvement of the quality payment program by improving data reporting process: an action research

Willingness to pay for physician services at a primary contact in Ukraine: results of a contingent valuation study

Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study