NDLI: Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Benzinger, Lasse Epping, Jelena Ursin, Frank Salloch, Sabine
Abstract	Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various healthcare domains, where AI algorithms sometimes even outperform human specialists. However, the field of clinical ethics has remained largely untouched by AI advances. This study explores the attitudes of anesthesiologists and internists towards the use of AI-driven preference prediction tools to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients. Methods A questionnaire was developed and pretested among medical students. The questionnaire was distributed to 200 German anesthesiologists and 200 German internists, thereby focusing on physicians who often encounter patients lacking decision-making capacity. The questionnaire covered attitudes toward AI-driven preference prediction, availability and utilization of Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS), and experiences with ethically challenging situations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis was performed. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis in a mixed inductive-deductive approach. Results Participants were predominantly male (69.3%), with ages ranging from 27 to 77. Most worked in nonacademic hospitals (82%). Physicians generally showed hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction, citing concerns about the loss of individuality and humanity, lack of explicability in AI results, and doubts about AI’s ability to encompass the ethical deliberation process. In contrast, physicians had a more positive opinion of CESS. Availability of CESS varied, with 81.8% of participants reporting access. Among those without access, 91.8% expressed a desire for CESS. Physicians' reluctance toward AI-driven preference prediction aligns with concerns about transparency, individuality, and human-machine interaction. While AI could enhance the accuracy of predictions and reduce surrogate burden, concerns about potential biases, de-humanisation, and lack of explicability persist. Conclusions German physicians frequently encountering incapacitated patients exhibit hesitance toward AI-driven preference prediction but hold a higher esteem for CESS. Addressing concerns about individuality, explicability, and human-machine roles may facilitate the acceptance of AI in clinical ethics. Further research into patient and surrogate perspectives is needed to ensure AI aligns with patient preferences and values in complex medical decisions.
Related Links	https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z.pdf
Ending Page	10
Page Count	10
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14726939
DOI	10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z
Journal	BMC Medical Ethics
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	25
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2024-07-18
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Ethics Philosophy of Medicine Theory of Medicine Bioethics Artificial intelligence Preference prediction Incapacitated patients Survey Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects Health Policy Health (social science)
Journal Impact Factor	3/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	3.1/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons

Ethical decision making in dental education: a preliminary study

Nurses’ ethical decision-making during end of life care in South Korea: a cross-sectional descriptive survey

Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care

Caring for older patients with reduced decision-making capacity: a deductive exploratory study of ambulance clinicians’ ethical competence

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers at rural health facilities in Eastern Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study

Rationality and the genetic challenge revisited.

Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists

Similar Documents

Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons

Ethical decision making in dental education: a preliminary study

Nurses’ ethical decision-making during end of life care in South Korea: a cross-sectional descriptive survey

Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care

Caring for older patients with reduced decision-making capacity: a deductive exploratory study of ambulance clinicians’ ethical competence

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers at rural health facilities in Eastern Uganda: an exploratory qualitative study

Rationality and the genetic challenge revisited.

Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists