NDLI: Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter?

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Payen, Didier Gayat, Etienne
Abstract	From the report by Connors and coworkers in 1996 until now, much effort has been directed at demonstrating the safety and/or effectiveness of strategies based on pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) data. Although studies have failed to demonstrate a clear benefit of PAC use, neither have any corroborated the initial report of PAC-induced mortality. With this in mind, it is important to clarify the indications for PAC, taking into account the development of new technologies to measure cardiac output and stroke volume. The present review focuses on safety and effectiveness data, with a special focus on reasonable indications for PAC use in the intensive care unit. The PAC has evolved since its initial presentation, and it now offers numerous parameters in addition to cardiac output and pressure measurement, such as mixed oxygen saturation and right ventricular ejection fraction. Because many techniques may be used to measure cardiac output, the indications for PAC use have become founded on other parameters that are useful in more specific situations, essentially involving the right circulation.
Related Links	https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/cc4925.pdf
Ending Page	6
Page Count	6
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	13648535
DOI	10.1186/cc4925
Journal	Critical Care
Issue Number	3
Volume Number	10
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2006-11-27
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Intensive Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Septic Shock Propensity Score Severe Sepsis Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Intensive Care Unit Patient
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Review
Subject	Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Journal Impact Factor	8.8/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	10.4/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Outcome and mortality risk factors of patients presenting to the ICU with severe sepsis and septic shock

Hemodynamic profile and vasoactive drugs in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Year in review 2013: Critical Care – sepsis

Diagnosis and treatment of severe sepsis

Veno–veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock

Effects on management and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit after implementation of a sepsis program: a pilot study

Endocan can be a predictive marker of severity of sepsis but cannot be a marker of acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICU patients

Extravascular lung water in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective cohort study

Outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock patients with hematological malignancies: impact of recent intravenous chemotherapeutic treatment

Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter?

Similar Documents

Outcome and mortality risk factors of patients presenting to the ICU with severe sepsis and septic shock

Hemodynamic profile and vasoactive drugs in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Year in review 2013: Critical Care – sepsis

Diagnosis and treatment of severe sepsis

Veno–veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock

Effects on management and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit after implementation of a sepsis program: a pilot study

Endocan can be a predictive marker of severity of sepsis but cannot be a marker of acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICU patients

Extravascular lung water in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective cohort study

Outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock patients with hematological malignancies: impact of recent intravenous chemotherapeutic treatment

Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter?