NDLI: Joint response–effect compatibility

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Pfister, Roland Dolk, Thomas Prinz, Wolfgang Kunde, Wilfried
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	When performing jointly on a task, human agents are assumed to represent their coactor’s share of this task, and research in various joint action paradigms has focused on representing the coactor’s stimulus–response assignments. Here we show that the response–effect (R–E) contingencies exploited by a coactor also affect performance, and thus might be represented as if they were used by oneself. Participants performed an R–E compatibility task, with keypresses producing spatially compatible or incompatible action effects. We did not observe any R–E compatibility effects when the task was performed in isolation (individual go–no-go). By contrast, small but reliable R–E compatibility effects emerged when the same task was performed in a joint setting. These results indicate that the knowledge of a coactor’s R–E contingencies can influence whether self-produced action effects are used for one’s own motor control.
Starting Page	817
Ending Page	822
Page Count	6
File Format	PDF
ISSN	10699384
Journal	Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume Number	21
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	15315320
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2013-10-08
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Joint action Motor control Action effects R–E compatibility Cognitive Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Arts and Humanities Developmental and Educational Psychology

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Effect-based control of facial expressions: Evidence from action–effect compatibility

Action-effect binding by observational learning

Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention

The joint flanker effect: Less social than previously thought

Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks

Temporal response-effect compatibility

Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus–response compatibility

Eye movements may cause motor contagion effects

Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations

Joint response–effect compatibility

Similar Documents

Effect-based control of facial expressions: Evidence from action–effect compatibility

Action-effect binding by observational learning

Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention

The joint flanker effect: Less social than previously thought

Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks

Temporal response-effect compatibility

Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus–response compatibility

Eye movements may cause motor contagion effects

Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations

Joint response–effect compatibility