NDLI: Suppose Hippocrates Had Been a Lawyer: a Conceptual Model of Harm to Litigants; Part 2

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Aurbach, Robert
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	It is well established that environmental factors can have impact upon an injured person’s recovery and return-to-work outcomes. There is substantial evidence supporting the contribution of lawyers and the legal process to poorer outcomes for injured workers. To date, there has been no cohesive model to provide theoretical understanding of the way in which these divergent factors combine to create disability behaviours. The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual model for understanding the development of disability behaviour in a legal context. Interpolation from existing neuroplasticity experimentation and therapeutic practice and observed behaviours and studies of behaviour in the workers’ compensation environment, including existing research concerning predictors for disability. The paper describes a conceptual model for understanding the contributions of lawyers and the legal system to instances of disability that are not necessarily attributable to physical harm. Discussion based upon the conceptual model for a new paradigm of legal practice follows. Factors that contribute to the formation of a neural network supporting the behaviour of learned disability are described. From that description, a shift in the paradigm of legal practice to reduce the unintended impacts upon clients is discussed.
Starting Page	228
Ending Page	237
Page Count	10
File Format	PDF
ISSN	1938971X
Journal	Psychological Injury and Law
Volume Number	6
Issue Number	3
e-ISSN	19389728
Language	English
Publisher	Springer US
Publisher Date	2013-09-20
Publisher Place	Boston
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Neuroplasticity Injury management Legal system Law and Psychology Clinical Psychology Psychology
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Ecology Law Psychiatry and Mental Health

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Suppose Hippocrates Had Been a Lawyer: a Conceptual Model of Harm to Litigants: Part 1

Disentangling the Disability Quagmire in Psychological Injury and Law : Part 2: Evolution of Disability Models: Conceptual, Methodological and Forensic Practice Issues

Exploring Lawyer–Client Interaction : A Qualitative Study of Positive Lawyer Characteristics

Psychological Safety for Mental Health Practitioners: Suggestions from a Defense Lawyer

Trauma and Psychological Injury: Practice, Clinical, Legal, and Ethical Issues

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) Is an Empirically Validated Measure of Overreporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008)

Using a Five-Stage Model to Evaluate Workplace Discrimination Injuries

Erratum to: The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to Williams et al. (2009)

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to William et al. (2009)

Suppose Hippocrates Had Been a Lawyer: a Conceptual Model of Harm to Litigants; Part 2

Similar Documents

Suppose Hippocrates Had Been a Lawyer: a Conceptual Model of Harm to Litigants: Part 1

Disentangling the Disability Quagmire in Psychological Injury and Law : Part 2: Evolution of Disability Models: Conceptual, Methodological and Forensic Practice Issues

Exploring Lawyer–Client Interaction : A Qualitative Study of Positive Lawyer Characteristics

Psychological Safety for Mental Health Practitioners: Suggestions from a Defense Lawyer

Trauma and Psychological Injury: Practice, Clinical, Legal, and Ethical Issues

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) Is an Empirically Validated Measure of Overreporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008)

Using a Five-Stage Model to Evaluate Workplace Discrimination Injuries

Erratum to: The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to Williams et al. (2009)

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to William et al. (2009)

Suppose Hippocrates Had Been a Lawyer: a Conceptual Model of Harm to Litigants; Part 2