NDLI: The Juror, the Citizen, and the Human Being: The Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Judgment

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Clark, Sherman J.
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	In this essay, I suggest that the criminal trial is not only about the guilt or innocence of the defendant, but also about the character and growth of the jurors and the communities they represent. In earlier work, I have considered the potential impact of law and politics on the character of citizens, and thus on the capacity of citizens to thrive—to live full and rich human lives. Regarding the jury, I have argued that aspects of criminal trial procedure work to fix in jurors a sense of agency in and responsibility for verdicts of conviction. Here, I draw on those ideas with respect to the presumption of innocence. I suggest that the presumption of innocence works not primarily as legal rule, but rather as a moral framing device—a sort of moral discomfort device—encouraging jurors to feel and bear the weight of what they do. I offer an account of character development in which virtues are conceived of not merely as modes of conduct developed through habituation and practice, but also as capacities and ways of being developed in part through understanding and experience. The criminal trial, framed by the presumption of innocence, can be an experience through which jurors and their communities, by learning what it means and feels like to carry a certain sort of moral weight, may engender a certain set of moral strengths—strengths valuable to them not just as jurors, but also as citizens, and as human beings.
Starting Page	421
Ending Page	429
Page Count	9
File Format	PDF
ISSN	18719791
Journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume Number	8
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	18719805
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2013-07-25
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Jury Criminal trial Character Presumption of innocence Thriving Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History Philosophy of Law Criminal Law Ethics
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Similar Documents

The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence

Preventive Justice and the Presumption of Innocence

The Presumption of Punishment

Assuming that the Defendant Is Not Guilty: The Presumption of Innocence in the German System of Criminal Justice

Preface: The Presumption of Innocence

Rethinking the presumption of innocence

Could the Presumption of Innocence Protect the Guilty?

The Right to be Presumed Innocent

The Ideal of the Presumption of Innocence

The Juror, the Citizen, and the Human Being: The Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Judgment