NDLI: The Right to be Presumed Innocent

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Stewart, Hamish
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	The presumption of innocence has often been understood as a doctrine that can be explained primarily by instrumental concerns relating to accurate fact-finding in the criminal trial and that has few if any implications outside the trial itself. In this paper, I argue, in contrast, that in a liberal legal order everyone has a right to be presumed innocent simply in virtue of being a person. Every person has a right not to be subjected to criminal punishment unless and until he or she has done something that is criminally wrong. Since disagreements about allegations of criminal wrongdoing are inevitable, the liberal legal order requires a process for determining whether wrongdoing has occurred. In order to preserve the right not to be punished without wrongdoing, the accused person must be presumed innocent throughout this process. The presumption of innocence is therefore as much a basic human right as, for example, the right to bodily integrity or the right to freedom of expression. Specifications of and limitations on the right should therefore be justified not primarily in terms of their instrumental effectiveness in fact-finding or crime control but in terms of the role of the criminal process in a liberal legal order. I consider some implications of this view of the presumption of innocence for the pre-trial process and for substantive criminal law. I argue that the presumption of innocence, understood as a basic human right, should condition the entire pre-trial process; it has, however, minimal implications for the definition of offences.
Starting Page	407
Ending Page	420
Page Count	14
File Format	PDF
ISSN	18719791
Journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume Number	8
Issue Number	2
e-ISSN	18719805
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Netherlands
Publisher Date	2013-05-03
Publisher Place	Dordrecht
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Presumption of innocence Human rights Kant Criminal procedure Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History Philosophy of Law Criminal Law Ethics
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Philosophy Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Similar Documents

The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence

Who is Presumed Innocent of What by Whom?

The Ideal of the Presumption of Innocence

Assuming that the Defendant Is Not Guilty: The Presumption of Innocence in the German System of Criminal Justice

The Juror, the Citizen, and the Human Being: The Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Judgment

Loss of Innocence in Common Law Presumptions

Preface: The Presumption of Innocence

Criminal and Procedural Fairness: Some Challenges to the Presumption of Innocence

Preventive Justice and the Presumption of Innocence

The Right to be Presumed Innocent