NDLI: Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Kim, Seungdo Dale, Bruce E.
Copyright Year	2009
Abstract	Regional variations in the environmental impacts of plant biomass production are significant, and the environmental impacts associated with feedstock supply also contribute substantially to the environmental performance of biobased products. Thus, the regional variations in the environmental performance of biobased products are also significant. This study scrutinizes greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with two biobased products (i.e., ethanol and soybean oil) whose feedstocks (i.e., corn and soybean) are produced in different farming locations.We chose 40 counties in Corn Belt States in the United States as biorefinery locations (i.e., corn dry milling, soybean crushing) and farming sites, and estimated cradle-to-gate GHG emissions of ethanol and of soybean oil, respectively. The estimates are based on 1 kg of each biobased product (i.e., ethanol or soybean oil). The system boundary includes biomass production, the biorefinery, and upstream processes. Effects of direct land use change are included in the greenhouse gas analysis and measured as changes in soil organic carbon level, while the effects of indirect land use change are not considered in the baseline calculations. Those indirect effects however are scrutinized in a sensitivity analysis.GHG emissions of corn-based ethanol range from 1.1 to 2.0 kg of CO$_{2}$ equivalent per kilogram of ethanol, while GHG emissions of soybean oil are 0.4–2.5 kg of CO$_{2}$ equivalent per kilogram of soybean oil. Thus, the regional variations due to farming locations are significant (by factors of 2–7). The largest GHG emission sources in ethanol production are N$_{2}$O emissions from soil during corn cultivation and carbon dioxide from burning the natural gas used in corn dry milling. The second largest GHG emission source groups in the ethanol production system are nitrogen fertilizer (8–12%), carbon sequestration by soil (−15–2%), and electricity used in corn dry milling (7–16%). The largest GHG emission sources in soybean oil production are N$_{2}$O emissions from soil during soybean cultivation (13–57%) and carbon dioxide from burning the natural gas used in soybean crushing (21–47%). The second largest GHG emission source groups in soybean oil production are carbon sequestration by soil (−29–24%), diesel used in soybean cultivation (4–24%), and electricity used in the soybean crushing process (10–21%). The indirect land use changes increase GHG emissions of ethanol by 7–38%, depending on the fraction of forest converted when newly converted croplands maintain crop cultivation for 100 years.Farming sites with higher biomass yields, lower nitrogen fertilizer application rates, and less tillage are favorable to future biorefinery locations in terms of global warming. For existing biorefineries, farmers are encouraged to apply a site-specific optimal nitrogen fertilizer application rate, to convert to no-tillage practices and also to adopt winter cover practices whenever possible to reduce the GHG emissions of their biobased products. Current practices for estimating the effects of indirect land use changes suffer from large uncertainties. More research and consensus about system boundaries and allocation issues are needed to reduce uncertainties related to the effects of indirect land use changes.
Starting Page	540
Ending Page	546
Page Count	7
File Format	PDF
ISSN	09483349
Journal	The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume Number	14
Issue Number	6
e-ISSN	16147502
Language	English
Publisher	Springer-Verlag
Publisher Date	2009-06-10
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Direct land use change Ethanol Greenhouse gas Indirect land use change LCA Soybean oil Environmental Economics Environment
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Environmental Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Indirect Land Use Change Debate: What Did We Learn?

Climate change impacts on life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings of biomethanol from corn and soybean

Baseline time accounting: Considering global land use dynamics when estimating the climate impact of indirect land use change caused by biofuels

Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions related to aluminium transport applications

Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol

Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia

Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol

Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories

Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway

Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil

Similar Documents

Indirect Land Use Change Debate: What Did We Learn?

Climate change impacts on life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings of biomethanol from corn and soybean

Baseline time accounting: Considering global land use dynamics when estimating the climate impact of indirect land use change caused by biofuels

Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions related to aluminium transport applications

Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol

Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia

Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol

Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories

Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway

Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil