Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | Springer Nature Link |
|---|---|
| Author | Kronenberg, Tobias |
| Copyright Year | 2012 |
| Abstract | Input-output models are useful tools for regional science owing to their ability to capture many of the distinguishing features of a regional economy. Since input-output tables are hard to find at the regional level, many researchers adopt nonsurvey techniques to derive regional input-output tables (RIOTs). Numerous methods have been suggested and this has spawned a stream of literature comparing the relative performance of these methods.The present paper contributes to that literature by examining a largely neglected problem of nonsurvey techniques: the allocation of imports. In the European System of Accounts (ESA), there are two ways of allocating imports: inside the interindustry transactions matrix or outside. In the former case, they are allocated as imports in the sector that produces similar goods (indirect allocation). In the latter case, imported products are allocated to the sector that uses them (direct allocation).This paper shows that the choice of a nonsurvey method should depend on the way in which imports are allocated. If the nonsurvey method is not properly chosen, the results of the procedure may be misleading and implausible. The paper concludes that LQ methods are better suited for regionalising input-output tables with directly allocated imports, whereas commodity-balance methods like CHARM are better suited for regionalising input-output tables with indirectly allocated imports.Input-Output-Modelle sind für die Regionalwissenschaft nützlich, weil sie viele der Merkmale eines regionalen Wirtschaftsraums erfassen können. Da Input-Output-Tabellen auf regionaler Ebene schwer zu finden sind, werden häufig Nonsurvey-Verfahren angewendet, um regionale Input-Output-Tabellen (RIOT) zu erstellen. Zahlreiche Methoden sind vorgeschlagen worden. Angesichts der zunehmenden Methodenvielfalt ist eine Literatur entstanden, in der die Leistungen der unterschiedlichen Methoden miteinander verglichen werden.Das vorliegende Papier trägt zu dieser Literatur bei, indem es sich einem weitgehend vernachlässigten Problem der Nonsurvey-Verfahren widmet: der Verbuchung der Importe. Im Europäischen System Volkswirtschaftlicher Gesamtrechnungen (ESVG) gibt es zwei Möglichkeiten, die Importe zu verbuchen: innerhalb der interindustriellen Transaktionsmatrix oder außerhalb. Im letzteren Fall werden importierte Produkte dem sie verwendenden Sektor zugeordnet (direkte Zuordnung). Im ersteren Fall werden sie als Importe dem Sektor, der ähnliche Güter produziert, zugeordnet (indirekte Zuordnung).Dieser Artikel zeigt, dass die Wahl der Nonsurvey-Methode davon abhängen sollte, wie die Importe zugeordnet werden. Wenn die Nonsurvey-Methode nicht korrekt gewählt wird, kann dies zu irreführenden und implausiblen Ergebnissen führen. Der Artikel kommt zu dem Fazit, dass LQ-Methoden zur Regionalisierung von Tabellen mit direkt zugeordneten Importen geeignet sind, wohingegen Commodity-Balance-Methoden wie CHARM besser geeignet sind, um Tabellen mit indirekt zugeordneten Importen zu regionalisieren. |
| Starting Page | 175 |
| Ending Page | 191 |
| Page Count | 17 |
| File Format | |
| ISSN | 01737600 |
| Journal | Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft |
| Volume Number | 32 |
| Issue Number | 2 |
| e-ISSN | 16139836 |
| Language | German |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag |
| Publisher Date | 2012-04-04 |
| Publisher Place | Berlin, Heidelberg |
| Access Restriction | One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) |
| Subject Keyword | Regional input-output model Nonsurvey method Location quotient Commodity balance Population Economics Environmental Economics Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Regional/Spatial Science Geography (general) |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Geography, Planning and Development Economics and Econometrics |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|