Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Adhesion analysis for niobium nitride thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Șerdean, Florina Maria Crișan, Horea George Merie, Violeta Valentina Negrea, Gavril |
| Copyright Year | 2018 |
| Abstract | This paper focuses on determining the adhesion force for four samples of niobium nitride thin films using the atomic force microscope, samples which were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering on silicon substrates. The main objective is to investigate the influence of the deposition parameters on the adhesion force and other important parameters. Hence, the nitrogen flow rate was varied in order to identify its influence for this type of thin films. Several tests were performed in multiple points of each sample using the spectroscopy in point mode of the atomic force microscope. Using the obtained experimental values and two existing mathematical models for the adhesion force, the surface energy of the niobium nitride thin films was estimated. Introduction Adhesion forces at microand nanoscale have been the focus of many researchers’ work due to their influence on failure mechanisms in Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Due to the intensive growth of MEMS, issues such as reliability and long-term durability have gained importance. At micro-scale such aspects are influenced by the fact that the surface forces become more significant than the body forces. Therefore, it is vital to study characteristics such as roughness or adhesion force, that lead to permanent surface attachment, also known as stiction. Along the years several thin films have been investigated in order to determine the adhesion force and other properties (mechanical, tribological, etc.) [1-2]. Due to their applicability in MEMS industry, thin films still present interest for researchers [3-4] and several methods have been used to deposit niobium nitride (NbN) thin films [5-7]. One of the high-resolution methods that allows to measure the adhesion force is the atomic force microscopy (AFM). The procedure consists in moving the tip of the AFM cantilever close to the sample surface. Due to the existing attraction forces they come in contact (the snap-in phenomenon occurs). The loading phase continues and the cantilever is deflected. During the unloading when the cantilever goes back to its initial position the contact between the tip and the sample is broken (the pull-off phenomenon occurs). The AFM software provides a curve that allows to determine the adhesion force (a representative example is given in Fig. 1). Powder Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – RoPM&AM 2017 Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 8 (2018) 212-218 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291999-24 213 Fig. 1. An example of the force vs. z scan curve for the contact between the AFM tip and the sample surface. In the open literature there are investigations regarding the influence of fabrication parameters on crystallization, microstructure, and surface composition of NbN thin films [8] and methods such as scratch tests have been used to determine the adhesion [9]. In contrast with the existing research, the present paper encompasses the research regarding the influence of the nitrogen flow rate on the adhesion and other characteristics of NbN thin films. The experimental investigations were conducted using the spectroscopy in point mode of the AFM. Materials and experimental procedure Materials This paper is focused on studying four samples consisting in solid thin films of niobium nitride. They were obtained by depositing one layer of niobium nitride on a silicon Si (100) substrate by reactive magnetron sputtering using a Nb target with a purity of 99.95%. The deposition was conducted in a high vacuum chamber containing a mixture of argon and nitrogen. Using a constant discharge current Id, a constant argon flow rate QAr and a constant pressure P, all samples were deposited for the same period of time at ambient temperature. The obtained thickness of the deposited thin films was around 0.32 μm and it was determined using a JEOL 5600LV electron microscope. As shown in Table 1, the nitrogen flow rate was varied between 0.25 cm/min and 1.75 cm/min. Table 1. Deposition conditions for investigated samples. Thin film T (°C) Time (min) P (mtorr) Id (mA) QAr (cm/mi n) QN2 (cm/mi n) Sample 1 23 20 2.2 300 40 0.25 Sample 2 23 20 2.2 300 40 0.75 Sample 3 23 20 2.2 300 40 1.25 Sample 4 23 20 2.2 300 40 1.75 Powder Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – RoPM&AM 2017 Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 8 (2018) 212-218 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291999-24 214 Motivated by the applicability of niobium nitride thin films experimental tests were conducted in order to determine the adhesion force. The software of the AFM used to find the adhesion forces provides several important characteristics that present interest such as roughness together with its characteristic statistics (see for example Fig. 2), the snap-in force or the adhesion energy (see for example Fig. 3 where the results are presented for the third conducted measurement). Experimental procedure The experimental procedure regarding the four thin films at nano-scale was conducted in the Micro & Nano Systems Laboratory from the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca using a XE 70 AFM. The investigations were performed at a temperature of 23 °C, a relative humidity of 35 % and a scanning frequency of 0.75 Hz. The cantilever used for the tests is a NSC35C cantilever which, according to the specifications provided by the manufacturer has a width of 35 μm, a length of 130 μm, a thickness of 2 μm, a force constant of 5.4 N/m and a resonance frequency of 150 kHz. The tip radius of the cantilever is smaller than 20 nm. The XEI Image Processing Tool for SPM (Scanning Probe Microscopy) Data was used for data interpretation. Fig. 2. The surface of Sample 3 and the statistical parameters provided for its roughness by the AFM software. The technique used to determine the adhesion force (the pull-off force) between the AFM tip and the NbN thin films, as well as other parameters of interest such as the snap-in force and adhesion energy is the spectroscopy in point mode of the AFM. This technique returns as output together with values for different parameters, some AFM experimental curves similar to the one presented in Fig. 3 which present both the loading and the unloading phases of the procedure. The values of the adhesion forces between the AFM tip and each of the four NbN thin films were Powder Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – RoPM&AM 2017 Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 8 (2018) 212-218 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291999-24 215 obtained based on these curves and determined automatically by the software (see in Fig. 3 the value for the pull-off force). The measurements of the adhesion force were conducted in 5 random points for each sample and the average value was computed. The points were chosen by studying the 3D image of each sample (see for example Fig. 4) so that any defects are avoided. This procedure was repeated for roughness, snap-in force and adhesion energy. Fig. 3. The force vs. z scan curve together with the charactristics provided by the AFM software for an experimental test conducted on Sample 3. Fig. 4. 3D image of the third sample. Powder Metallurgy and Advanced Materials – RoPM&AM 2017 Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings 8 (2018) 212-218 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291999-24 216 Theoretical models One of the main factors that influence the adhesion is the type of contact between the surfaces. This contact has been modelled in different ways along the years of research in order to accurately estimate the adhesion force. Two of the most known and used models are the JKR (JohnsonKendall-Roberts) model and the DMT (Derjaguin-Müller-Toporov) model. These models were established due to the need to remove the differences between the values when applying experimental tests and when applying the Hertz theory for low loads. In both models the adhesion force is expressed as a function of the surface energy [10]: |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| Volume Number | 8 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://www.mrforum.com/wp-content/uploads/open_access/9781945291999/24.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.21741/9781945291999-24 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
