Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Advocacia-Geral da União : instituição de estado ou de governo ? estudo comparativo entre os governos FHC (1999-2002) e Lula (2007-2010)
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Paiva, Adriano Martins De |
| Copyright Year | 2015 |
| Abstract | The Attorney General of the Union is provided in Art. 131 from the CF/88 with the exclusive assignment court to represent the Union providing advice and counsel to the Federal Executive. Like a Brazilian democratization product is linked directly to the President, with the task of translating the political project of the government. After we deploy the normative theories that conceive as a state institution more or less autonomous against the government, we present a documentary research from acts produced during the FHC (1999-2002) and LULA (2007-2010), whose analysis of the result shows a variation of institutional action in accordance with the political project running. Still reap impressions of Union lawyers to illustrate the influence of the Executive in the functional autonomy of the body, notably through the commissioned positions. In conclusion, we point out the prospects for organic and functional changes that can guarantee the Union Attorney General recommended the institutional performance in the constitution, in order that it may ultimately contribute to the legal viability of public policies essential for the improvement of the democratic state. |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.26512/2015.12.D.18001 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | http://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/18001/1/2015_AdrianoMartinsdePaiva.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.26512/2015.12.D.18001 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
