NDLI: Manual Vacuum Aspiration versus Sharp Curettage for Incomplete Abortion: Which One is Better?

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Manual Vacuum Aspiration versus Sharp Curettage for Incomplete Abortion: Which One is Better?

Content Provider	Semantic Scholar
Author	Adjie, Jm Seno Triyadi, Erik J.
Copyright Year	2019
Abstract	Objective : To acknowledge the effectiveness and safety of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) compared with Sharp Curettage (SC) in the management of incomplete abortion below 12 weeks of gestation which compare time to perform the procedure, rates of evacuation and infection one week after the procedure, and complication during MVA and SC procedure. Methods : A prospective study with 62 subjects with incomplete abortion came to the emergency wom of at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital, Fatmawati hospital and Karawang hospital, divided into 31 subjects on MVA group and 31 subjects on SC group. The data was documented on the time of MVA procedure compare to SC, clinical fi ndings on complication during the procedure, completed evacuation and infection symptoms one week after the procedure. Results : Sixty two subjects (31 each group) with average time of procedure was 17,65 ± 4,128 minutes and SC was 22,26 ± 4,611 minutes with p = 0,00 and 95% CI; -4,513(6,837 to -2,389 with signifi cant statistically difference. The comparison of completed evacuation one week after procedure was 3,2% (n = 1) on MVA and 6,5% (n = 2) on SC with clinical fi ndings, and p = 0,554, RR = 1,034 and 95% CI 0,924 – 1,158 with no statistically difference. On the other comparison, we did not fi nd any infection symptoms one week after procedure and complication during the procedure on both procedures. Conclusions : MVA has more effective than SC on the time of procedure in incomplete abortion with below 12 weeks of gestation. MVA has superiority from completed evacuation but no statistical difference and has equal safety to SC on clinical infection symptoms and complication during the
Starting Page	76
Ending Page	79
Page Count	4
File Format	PDF HTM / HTML
DOI	10.32771/inajog.v7i2.879
Alternate Webpage(s)	http://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/download/879/570
Alternate Webpage(s)	https://doi.org/10.32771/inajog.v7i2.879
Language	English
Access Restriction	Open
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Central Library (ISO-9001:2015 Certified)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India | PIN - 721302

See location in the Map
03222 282435
Mail: support@ndl.gov.in

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in