Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Un concepto de daño y sus consecuencias para la parte general del derecho penal
| Content Provider | Semantic Scholar |
|---|---|
| Author | Borgogno, Santiago Truccone |
| Copyright Year | 2017 |
| Abstract | espanolEn este trabajo intentare defender una nocion combinada de dano de acuerdo a la cual existen dos tipos de danos cualitativamente diferentes. Asimismo, defendere un modo en que la gravedad de los diferentes danos puede ser graduada. Derivado de lo anterior, extraere tres principios sobre la fuerza de las razones en contra de danar. La tesis defendida proporcionara herramientas para resolver algunos problemas de la parte general de derecho penal. En relacion al tipo penal, mostrare que la nocion de dano defendida puede ayudar a resolver casos de cursos causales alternativos e hipoteticos. En referencia a la antijuridicidad, mostrare que la clasificacion de la gravedad de los danos propuesta ayuda a distinguir que casos de estado de necesidad deben considerarse como justificacion y cuales como excusa. En referencia a la culpabilidad, mostrare que los principios sobre la diferente fuerza de las razones en contra de danar ayudan a aportar criterios claros para la individualizacion de la pena a imponer por la comision de un delito. EnglishIn this work, I will support a combined notion of harm according to with there are qualitatively different harms. I will support a way in which the severity of harms could be measured. Then, I will provide three principles about the strength of the reasons against harming. The supported thesis will provide some tools to solve some problems of the general part of criminal law. In relation to the analytical stratum of statutory description of an offence, I will show that the defended notion of harm could help to solve cases of hypothetical and alternative causal courses. In relation to the analytical stratum of unlawfulness (or wrongfulness), I will show that the proposed ranking of the severity of harms help us to distinguish between cases of necessity as justification and necessity as excuse. In relation to the analytical stratum of culpability, I will show that the principles regarding the strength of the reasons against harming help us to supply straightforward criteria to measure the punishment to impose for having committed some crime. |
| Starting Page | 1184 |
| Ending Page | 1210 |
| Page Count | 27 |
| File Format | PDF HTM / HTML |
| DOI | 10.4067/s0718-33992017000201184 |
| Volume Number | 12 |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/politcrim/v12n24/0718-3399-politcrim-12-24-01184.pdf |
| Alternate Webpage(s) | https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992017000201184 |
| Language | English |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
