NDLI: Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update

Content Provider	PubMed Central
Author	Kobayashi, Junjiro
Copyright Year	2011
Abstract	Although porcine aortic valves or pericardial tissue mounted on a stent have made implantation techniques easier, these valves sacrifice orifice area and increase stress at the attachment of the stent, which causes primary tissue failure. Optimizing hemodynamics to prevent patient–prosthetic mismatch and improve durability, stentless bioprostheses use was revived in the early 1990s. The purpose of this review is to provide a current overview of stentless valves in the aortic position. Retrospective and prospective randomized controlled studies showed similar operative mortality and morbidity in stented and stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR), though stentless AVR required longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time. Several cohort studies showed improved survival after stentless AVR, probably due to better hemodynamic performance and earlier left ventricular (LV) mass regression compared with stented AVR. However, there was a bias of operation age and nonrandomization. A randomized trial supported an improved 8-year survival of patients with the Freestyle or Toronto valves compared with Carpentier–Edwards porcine valves. On the contrary, another randomized study did not show improved clinical outcomes up to 12 years. Freedom from reoperation at 12 years in Toronto stentless porcine valves ranged from 69% to 75%, which is much lower than for Carpentier–Edwards Perimount valves. Cusp tear with consequent aortic regurgitation was the most common cause of structural valve deterioration. Cryolife O’Brien valves also have shorter durability compared with stent valves. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 44% at 10 years. Early prosthetic valve failure was also reported in patients who underwent root replacement with Shelhigh stentless composite grafts. There was no level I or IIa evidence of more effective orifice area, mean pressure gradient, LV mass regression, surgical risk, durability, and late outcomes in stentless bioprostheses. There is no general recommendation to prefer stentless bioprostheses in all patients. For new-generation pericardial stentless valves, follow-up over 15 years is necessary to compare the excellent results of stented valves such as the Carpentier–Edwards Perimount and Hancock II valves.
Related Links	http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.s11253
Ending Page	351
Starting Page	345
File Format	PDF
ISSN	11782048
e-ISSN	11782048
Journal	Vascular Health and Risk Management
Volume Number	7
Language	English
Publisher	Dove Medical Press
Publisher Date	2011-06-01
Access Restriction	Open
Rights Holder	Dove Medical Press
Subject Keyword	Research in Higher Education
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease with stentless bovine pericardium prosthesis: immediate results

Reinterventions after freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement: an assessment of procedural risks

Structural Valve Deterioration After Aortic Valve Replacement with Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprostheses

A case of freestyle valve reoperation 23 years after the first operation

An alternative subcoronary implantation technique decreases the risk of complete heart block after stentless aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter CoreValve valve-in-valve implantation in a stentless porcine aortic valve for severe aortic regurgitation

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Aortic valve replacement with 'stentless' versus mechanical prosthesis: what difference in postoperative ICU course?

Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update

Similar Documents

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease with stentless bovine pericardium prosthesis: immediate results

Reinterventions after freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement: an assessment of procedural risks

Structural Valve Deterioration After Aortic Valve Replacement with Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprostheses

A case of freestyle valve reoperation 23 years after the first operation

An alternative subcoronary implantation technique decreases the risk of complete heart block after stentless aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter CoreValve valve-in-valve implantation in a stentless porcine aortic valve for severe aortic regurgitation

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

Aortic valve replacement with 'stentless' versus mechanical prosthesis: what difference in postoperative ICU course?

Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update