Content Provider | Supreme Court of India |
---|---|
e-ISSN | 30484839 |
Language | English |
Access Restriction | NDLI |
Subject Keyword | Sentence/Sentencing: |
Content Type | Text |
Resource Type | Law Judgement |
Jurisdiction | India |
Case Type | Review Petition |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Disposal Nature | Others |
Headnote | Sentence/Sentencing: Death sentence - Conviction .of review petitioners for rape and murder of a minor girl of 4 years and award of death sentence - Held: In the judgment under review, this Court had considered the aggravating facts and the mitigating circumstances - The brutality and diabolical nature of the crime and the fact that the victim had reposed trust and confidence in the petitioner was taken into account and this Court found the aggravating circumstances completely outweighed the other factors - The court did not find any mitigating circumstances in favour of review petitioners for awarding lesser punishment - The evidence and circumstances were dealt with in the judgment under review in great detail - Therefore, no interference with the order of death sentence - Review petition liable to be dismissedDeath sentence - Plea of review petitioner that in the light of principles laid down in Bachan Singh, mitigating factors· ought to have been taken into account and that proper and effective hearing in that regard was not extended to the petitioner - Held: Plea not sustainable - Jn Bachan Singh case, the burden was·upon the State in respect of conditions (3) and (4) i.e. the probability that the accused would not commit criminal acts of violence as would constitute a continuing threat to society and the probability that the accused can be reformed and rehabilitated - It was stated therein that the State shall by evidence prove that the accused did not satisfy these two conditions - However, in the subsequent paragraphs it was mentioned that those circumstances would certainly be relevant and great weight be attached to them but it was the cumulative effect of mitigating circumstances on one hand and aggravating facts on A the other, which would be weighed to come to the final conclusion whether the case satisfied the requirement of being "rarest of rare" - Therefore, the correct interpretation of Bachan Singh case is that mere failure on part of the State to lead such evidence would not clinch the issue in favour of the accused - It is a relevant consideration which will be weighed by the Court together with other circumstances on record.Death sentence - Aggravating and mitigating circumstances - Both aspects have to be given their respective weightage - The court has to strike a balance between the two and see towards which side scale of justice tilts - The material placed on record showed that after the judgment under review, the petitioner completed Bachelors Preparatory Programme offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University enabling him to prepare for Bachelor level study and that he has also completed the Gandhi Vichar Pariksha and had participated in drawing competition - Jail record of the petitioner was without any blemish and it was projected that there was a possibility of the accused being reformed and rehabilitated - However, the aggravating circumstances namely the extreme depravity and the barbaric manner in which the crime was. committed and the fact that the victim was a helpless girl of four years clearly outweigh the mitigating circumstances brought on record - No case made out to take a different view in the matter.Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.235(2) - Scope of - Plea of review petitioner that the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence was passed by trial court on the same day which was opposed to the spirit of s.235(2) - Held: The purpose of s.235(2) is to give sufficient time to the accused or the prosecution on the question of sentence to show the grounds on which the prosecution may plead or accused may show that the maximum sentence of death may be the appropriate sentence or the minimum sentence of life imprisonment may be awarded as the case may be - However, merely because no separate date was given for hearing on sentence, the · entire exercise is not vitiated - Plea rejected - Sentence/Sentencing. |
Judge | Honble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit |
Neutral Citation | 2017 INSC 436 |
Petitioner | Vasanta Sampat Dupare |
Respondent | State Of Maharashtra |
SCR | [2017] 3 S.C.R. 850 |
Judgement Date | 2017-05-03 |
Case Number | 637-638 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |