NDLI: Indrajit Das Vs. The State of Tripura

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	201 IPC Murder extra-judicial confession ss. 302/34 Circumstantial evidence
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (56 of 2000) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1 Referred Case 2 Referred Case 3
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Allowed
Headnote	Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 302/34, 201 – Murder – Circumstantial evidence – Information received from one of the prosecution witness that his nephew was missing since the previous evening – Victim had gone on his bike but did not return – On further investigation, his mother informed that the victim had gone out with two friends – Both the friends alleged to have confessed their crime before the investigating officer – One of them being juvenile, tried under Juvenile Act – As regards the other the trial court held that the prosecution had fully established his guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and convicted him – Said order upheld by the High Court – On appeal, held : Instant case is of circumstantial evidence as no one saw the commission of crime – Basic links in the chain of circumstances starts with motive, then move on to last seen theory, recovery, medical evidence, expert opinions if any and any other additional link which may be part of the chain of circumstances – Prosecution did not come forward with any motive whatsoever as to why the appellant and the juvenile would commit the said crime – Dead body not recovered – Only a limb was recovered but no DNA testing was carried out to establish that the limb was that of the victim – As such the entire case of the prosecution proceeds on presumption that the victim died – Mother of the victim was the main witness of the last seen – In her cross-examination she stated that no such statement was there, though she had told the Investigating Officer that she had seen the appellant and the juvenile at her gate – Recoveries have been from an open place – It was not a place which could be in the exclusive knowledge of the appellant – Conviction is based upon, apart from the prosecution witnesses, on the extra-judicial confession of the appellant and the juvenile – According to both the confessions, the appellant as also juvenile were waiting at a culvert near the market where victim came on his bike and from there all three of them left on the bike – No corroborating evidence found to support the extra-judicial confession, rather the evidence led by prosecution is inconsistent with the same – Thus, major links of the chain of circumstances not proved by the prosecution evidence and as such it would be unjust to uphold the conviction of the appellant – Appellant entitled to benefit of doubt and is acquitted of all the charges – Evidence. Evidence: Circumstantial evidence – General principles – Discussed. Circumstantial Evidence – Motive – Importance and role of, in case of direct and circumstantial evidence – Stated.
Judge	Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
Neutral Citation	2023 INSC 175
Petitioner	Indrajit Das
Respondent	The State Of Tripura
SCR	[2023] 3 S.C.R. 142
Judgement Date	2023-02-28
Case Number	609

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Indrajit Das Vs. The State of Tripura

Please Log-in to view this content

John Anthonisamy @ John Vs. State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police

Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Sawal Das Vs. State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Balkar Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Rambraksh @ Jalim Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Baiju Kumar Soni & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Maghavendra Pratap Singh @ Pankaj Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Indrajit Das Vs. The State of Tripura

Indrajit Das Vs. The State of Tripura

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

John Anthonisamy @ John Vs. State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police

Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Sawal Das Vs. State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Balkar Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Rambraksh @ Jalim Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Baiju Kumar Soni & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Maghavendra Pratap Singh @ Pankaj Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Indrajit Das Vs. The State of Tripura