Content Provider | Supreme Court of India |
---|---|
e-ISSN | 30484839 |
Language | English |
Access Restriction | NDLI |
Subject Keyword | Administration of Justice: Writ Petition u/Art. 32 of the Constitution [W.P. (Cr/.) |
Content Type | Text |
Resource Type | Law Judgement |
Jurisdiction | India |
Case Type | Writ Petition |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Disposal Nature | Petition Dismissed |
Headnote | Administration of Justice: Writ Petition u/Art. 32 of the Constitution [W.P. (Cr/.) No. 16912017} filed on 8.11.2017 by Commission for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) - Stating that an FIR relating to criminal conspiracy and of taking illegal gratification to influence the outcome of a pending case before Supreme Court revealed a nexus between the middlemen, Hawala dealers and senior public functionaries including persons in judicial field - The petition was mentioned before Court No.2 and thereafter, it was listed for hearing on 10.11.2017 before a particular Bench - On 9.11.2017 another similar writ petition (present petition) identically worded, was filed by the petitioner (a member of (CJAR) and was mentioned before Court No.2 with a prayer to hear the matter on the same day - The Bench (Court No.2) posted the present petition before itself for hearing on the same day - After hearing, the Bench (Court No.2) decided to place the matter before Constitution Bench which would consist of senior most five Judges of the Court - When the WP (Cr/.) No.169/2017 came up for hearing before another Bench, the Court taking into account the order in the present case, directed to place the matter before the Chief Justice of India for passing appropriate orders - The matter was considered on administrative side by the Chief Justice and he constituted 5-Judge Constitution Bench - The Constitution Bench (constituted by the Chief Justice) on 10.11.2017 decided that the Chief Justice is the Master of roster G and no Bench can direct the composition for constitution of a Bench - Thereafter, the Chief Justice constituted 3-Judge Bench to hear the matter on 13.11.2017 - Plea was taken by petitioner that order dated 9.11.2017 (a/locating the matter to 5 senior most Judges) could have been passed under Art.142 of the Constitution and the order dated 9.11.2017 was binding on other courts in view of Art.144 and hence could not have been rendered ineffective by orderdated 10.11.2017 - Petitioners also took the plea that as the pendingmatter (order whereof was alleged to be influenced) was heard bythe Chief Justice, and by one of the Judges in the present Bench, thematter cannot ~e heard by a Bench constituted by the Chief Justiceand that the other Judge should recuse himself from the matter -Held: Arts. 144 or 142 are not applicable in the present case - Incase they are attracted, it is decision of Constitution Bench (wherebyit decided that Chief Justice is the master of roster) which is binding- It has been held by Constitution Bench that Chief Justice is thec master of roster and the present Bench was constituted by the ChiefJustice in his administrative capacity - It was highly improper toallege conflict of interest that the Chief Justice should not hear onjudicial side or allocate that matter on administrative side - Filingof two successive petitions are a misconceived venture, amountingto forum hunting and has brought the entire judicial system intodisrepute for no good cause - Asking for refusal of a particularJudge from the ratter is another attempt to forum hunting and alsoamounts to contempt of Court - Making such scandalous remarksalso tan/amounts to interference with administration of Justice -Constitution of India - Arts. 142, 144 and 145 - Supreme Court Rules, 2013 - Contempt of Court.Advocates:Petition filed by advocate in his/her personal capacity -Making scandalous remarks against judiciary - Held: Makingscandalous rem&rks ten/amounts to interference with administrationof justice - An advocate cannot escape the responsibility on theground that he/she drafted the same in his/her personal capacity.Maxim:"nemo judex in causa sua" - Applicability and scope of -Discussed. |
Judge | Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal |
Neutral Citation | 2017 INSC 1112 |
Petitioner | Kamini Jaiswal |
Respondent | Union Of India & Anr. |
SCR | [2017] 13 S.C.R. 189 |
Judgement Date | 2017-11-14 |
Case Number | 176 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |