NDLI: West U.p. Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	19531 U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act 1954-Sections 18
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Case(s) Referred	Referred Case 0 Referred Case 1
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Petition Allowed
Headnote	Legislative Intention:U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953/ U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954-Sections 18 and 28/Rule 49-Sugar factories to pay society commission to cooperative cane societies towards administrative expenses-Amendment of rule 49 providing society commission-Old rule 49 substituted by new rule 49-Substituted new rule operative for fixed period-Effect of old rule when substituted rule ceases to be operative-Held, old rule does not revive, since legislative intention is to repeal the old rule and substitute it with new one.Under Section 18 of the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953, appellants-sugarcane factories are required to pay a commission as society commission to the respondents-cooperative cane societies and the rate of commission is to be determined and prescribed by the State Government by the statutory rules. State Government amended rule 49 and revised the society commission and fixed at 5% of the minimum statutory cane price fixed by the Central Government. Subsequently, it substituted rule 49 by which society commission was at the rate of 2.69% of the minimum statutory price of sugarcane. Substituted rule remained operative for the period from 1.10.91 to 30.9.92. Thereafter, State Cane Commissioner ordered that after 30.9.92 commission shall be charged at the rate of 5% since the substituted rule became inoperative after 30.9.92 and old rule has revived. Aggrieved, appellant filed a petition challenging the order. High Court dismissed the petition holding that on application of Section 6-C of U.P. General Clauses Act, the repealed or deleted rule 49 revived after substituted rule 49 ceased to be operative. Hence the present appeal and the connected writ petition. Appellant contended that after the statutory rule 49 having been deleted or repealed and substituted by a new rule 49, the old rule 49 does not revive even after the substituted rule ceased to be operative and also that High Court was not legally justified in applying Section 6-C of the Act.Respondents contended that since the substituted rule in pith and substance has been rendered non-existent, the old rule would revive.
Judge	Honble Mr. Justice V.N. Khare
Neutral Citation	2002 INSC 69
Petitioner	West U.p. Sugar Mills Association And Ors.
Respondent	State Of U.p. And Ors.
SCR	[2002] 1 S.C.R. 897
Judgement Date	2002-02-07
Case Number	9453

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

Please Log-in to view this content

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association & Ors Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association & Ors. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

U.p. Cooperative Cane Union Federation Vs. West U.p. Sugar Mill Association and Ors.

Janki Sugar Mills & Co. Vs. Commissioner of Meerut Division, Meerut

S.k.g Sugar Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Agauta Sugar and Chemicals Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

U.p. State Sugar Corporation Vs. Burwal Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. and Ors

Ganga Sugar Co. Ltd., Etc. Vs. State of U.p. & Others Etc.

Shivashakti Sugars Limited Vs. Shree Renuka Sugar Limited & Ors.

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association & Ors Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association & Ors. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

U.p. Cooperative Cane Union Federation Vs. West U.p. Sugar Mill Association and Ors.

Janki Sugar Mills & Co. Vs. Commissioner of Meerut Division, Meerut

S.k.g Sugar Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Agauta Sugar and Chemicals Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.

U.p. State Sugar Corporation Vs. Burwal Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. and Ors

Ganga Sugar Co. Ltd., Etc. Vs. State of U.p. & Others Etc.

Shivashakti Sugars Limited Vs. Shree Renuka Sugar Limited & Ors.

West U.p. Sugar Mills Association and Ors. Vs. State of U.p. and Ors.