NDLI: Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.

Content Provider	Supreme Court of India
e-ISSN	30484839
Language	English
Access Restriction	NDLI
Subject Keyword	Industrial Disputes Act
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Law Judgement
Jurisdiction	India
Act(s) Referred	Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)
Case Type	Appeal
Court	Supreme Court of India
Disposal Nature	Appeal Allowed
Headnote	Industrial Disputes Act, section 25G-Applicability of the principle of "last come, first go" thereunder-Appellant firm carrying on business of metal processing with two Units commenced in 1963 and 1975 respectively-Both units had independent location, separate factory licences, separate municipal licences, separate accounts and balance sheet, and no inter transferability-Unit I closed completely on 15.2.1982 due to indiscipline of the 32 workmen employed therein gradually by first reducing their shifts from three to two-Closure compensation offered-Whether the closure is bad in law on the ground that there was functional integrality between the two units and were for all practicable purposes parts of one establishment-Whether the provisions of section 25G of the Act applied to the facts of the case. The appellant carries on the business of metal processing i.e. heat treatment of metals. In 1963 it established a factory with about 32 workmen-called "No. 1 Unit". In the year 1975 another factory called "No II unit" was established for carrying on the same kind of business employing about 75 workmen about 200 yards away from the No. 1 Unit. Both the Units had independent location, separate factory licences and separate municipal licences. The two Units bad separate stores and F maintained separate accounts and balance sheets. The workmen of both the units were also employed independently and there was a separate muster roll in respect of each of the two units. There was no rule or condition regarding the inter-transferability of the workmen. However, there was by mistake the name of one workman by name Kishore Ram of Unit 1 entered in the muster roll of the II Unit in October 1980 and it had been scored out later. On finding that the workmen of No. 1 Unit were wilfully slacking their work and that there was growing indiscipline among them, the appellant decided in the year 1981-82 to reduce the three shifts working previously to two shifts. The indiscipline and the lack of production continued and on it becoming impossible for the appellant to carry on with even the two shifts as reduced, the appellant came to the unhappy conclusion that it had no alternative left but to close down the No. 1 Unit altogether with effect from 15.2.82 and closure compensation was offered to the entire staff of 32 workmen.The workmen of the I Unit raised through their Union, namely, Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay an industrial dispute reference (IT) No. 218 of 1982. In the statement of claim filed by the workmen it was urged; (i) that the two units which were being run by the appellant had functional integrality and were for all purposes parts of one establishment and that the workmen were mutually transferable from one unit to the other; (ii) that the reasons given by the management for closing down Unit No.1 is false, the action of the management was arbitrary and was colourable exercise of the management's power of closure; (iii) the impugned action was by way of victimisation for the trade union activities of the said workmen in Unit No 1 and the principle of "last come,'first go" while terminating the services of the workmen having not been followed as required by section 25-G of the Act, the termination was illegal. The Tribunal rejected the case of the workmen that the closure was in retaliation to the trade union activities of workmen and found that there was no victimisation of the workmen and the workmen concerned were not entitled to be reinstated as the closure of the 1 Unit had become legally effective from 15.12.1982 and passed its award to that effect on September 6, 1983. Aggrieved by the A ward passed by the Tribunal, the workmen filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay challenging the legality of the Award. The learned Single Judge, before whom the writ petition came up for consideration, reversed the Award of the Tribunal and remanded the proceedings back to the Tribunal for afresh disposal. By the time, the decision was rendered, there were only 14 workmen, who were interested in the F dispute, and therefore, the learned Single Judge directed the Tribunal to consider whether the termination of services of any of the 14 workmen, whose claim for reinstatement still subsisted, was done in violation of the principles laid down under section· 25-G of the Act. Aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court. That appeal having G been dismissed the appellant has come by way of special leave to the Supreme Court.
Judge	Honble Mr. Justice E.S. Venkataramiah
Neutral Citation	1987 INSC 62
Petitioner	Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay
Respondent	Association Of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.
SCR	[1987] 2 S.C.R. 414
Judgement Date	1987-02-25
Case Number	2912

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Air India Corporation, Bombay Vs. V. A. Rebellow & Anr.

Workmen of Hindustan Steel Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Hindustan Steel Ltd. and Ors.

Heckett Engineering Co. Vs. Workmen

M/s Bombay Chemical Industries Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr.

Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. The B.e.s.t. Workers Union

Automobile Products of India Employees Union Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay and Ors.

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

National Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.

Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.

Please Log-in to view this content

Similar Documents

Air India Corporation, Bombay Vs. V. A. Rebellow & Anr.

Workmen of Hindustan Steel Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Hindustan Steel Ltd. and Ors.

Heckett Engineering Co. Vs. Workmen

M/s Bombay Chemical Industries Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr.

Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. The B.e.s.t. Workers Union

Automobile Products of India Employees Union Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay and Ors.

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

National Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Isha Steel Treatment, Bombay Vs. Association of Engineering Workers, Bombay & Anr.