NDLI: Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Year: 2017 Volume: 124

Year: 2016 Volume: 123

Year: 2015 Volume: 122

Year: 2014 Volume: 121

Year: 2013 Volume: 120

Year: 2013 Volume: 120 Issue: 4

Year: 2013 Volume: 120 Issue: 3

Dimensional comparison theory.

Likelihood-free Bayesian analysis of memory models.

Associations and the accumulation of preference.

The nature and transfer of cognitive skills.

A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models.

A neural population model for visual pattern detection.

A review of gene-environment correlations and their implications for autism: a conceptual model.

A competitive interaction theory of attentional selection and decision making in brief, multielement displays.

Sequential effects in response time reveal learning mechanisms and event representations.

A quantum geometric model of similarity.

Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination.

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).

On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: reply to Benjamin (2013).

Year: 2013 Volume: 120 Issue: 2

Year: 2013 Volume: 120 Issue: 1

Year: 2012 Volume: 119

Year: 2011 Volume: 118

Year: 2010 Volume: 117

Year: 2009 Volume: 116

Year: 2008 Volume: 115

Year: 2007 Volume: 114

Year: 2006 Volume: 113

Year: 2005 Volume: 112

Year: 2004 Volume: 111

Year: 2003 Volume: 110

Year: 2001 Volume: 108

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).

Content Provider	World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus
Author	Benjamin, Aaron S.
Description	Country affiliation: United States Author Affiliation: Benjamin AS ( Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 East Daniel Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. asbenjam@illinois.edu)
Abstract	Recent articles, including Benjamin, Diaz, and Wee (2009), have argued that recognition memory may be better understood if consideration is given to sources of noise in the decisions, as well as to those in the representations, underlying recognition judgments. They based that conclusion on a wide consideration of persisting mysteries in recognition research as well as a new experimental paradigm involving ensemble recognition. Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012) reanalyzed Benjamin et al.'s data and introduced their own new experimental paradigm to this debate. They concluded that criteria do not vary much from trial to trial in recognition testing and, thus, that decision noise in recognition is small or nonexistent. However, their alternative interpretation of Benjamin et al.'s data relies on a questionable conclusion to reject all models in which the locations of criteria are restricted to be the same across ensembles and a meta-assumption that a model should be rejected as false if it yields unconventional parameters. In addition, their experimental logic relies on the assumption that ranking tasks are always bias-free. Here, I question these assumptions and suggest avenues for reconciliation between these contrasting claims.
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	0033295X
e-ISSN	19391471
DOI	10.1037/a0031911
Journal	Psychological Review
Issue Number	3
Volume Number	120
Language	English
Publisher	American Psychological Association
Publisher Date	2013-07-01
Publisher Place	United States
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Discipline Psychology Decision Making Models, Statistical Psychological Theory Recognition (psychology) Signal Detection, Psychological
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Psychology History and Philosophy of Science

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: A comment on Kellen, Klauer, & Singmann (2012)

Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.

Reexamining Target-Probe Invariance: A Reply to Kellen and Singmann (2022)

Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen (2014)

Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory

ROC asymmetry is not diagnostic of unequal residual variance in Gaussian signal detection theory

Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen (2014)

Do you have to look where you go? Gaze behaviour during spatial decision making

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).

Similar Documents

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: A comment on Kellen, Klauer, & Singmann (2012)

Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.

Reexamining Target-Probe Invariance: A Reply to Kellen and Singmann (2022)

Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen (2014)

Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory

ROC asymmetry is not diagnostic of unequal residual variance in Gaussian signal detection theory

Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen (2014)

Do you have to look where you go? Gaze behaviour during spatial decision making

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).