NDLI: Systemic inflammatory response after extremity or truncal fracture operations.

Content Provider	World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus
Author	Pape, Hans-Christoph Griensven, Martijn V. Hildebrand, Frank F. Tzioupis, Chris T. Sommer, Kirsten L. Krettek, Christian C. Giannoudis, Peter V.
Description	Country affiliation: United States Author Affiliation: Pape HC ( Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. papehc@aol.com)
Abstract	BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess proinflammatory markers in blunt trauma patients regarding the relationship of these and blood loss and duration of surgery in different fracture locations. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized cohort study. SETTING: Three level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight blunt trauma patients, who did not require emergency operations and had sustained truncal or extremity fractures, were included. In two index patient groups, patients with spinal fractures (group SF, n = 24) and pelvic and acetabular fractures (group PAF, n = 21) underwent fixation of their fractures and were compared with a group of patients with isolated fractures (group FF, n = 28). Ten healthy volunteers served as controls. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation of pelvic, acetabular and spinal fractures, intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures, measurement of proinflammatory cytokines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: From serially sampled central venous blood, the perioperative concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 were evaluated during a 24-hour period and set into relation with the duration of surgery and the degree of blood loss. RESULTS: Intramedullary instrumentation for isolated PAF caused a significant perioperative increase in the concentrations of IL-6 (preoperative: 16 pg/mL +/- 12 pg/mL, 7 hours: 89 pg/mL +/- 15 pg/mL, and 24 hours: 107 pg/mL +/- 27 pg/mL, p < 0.05). This increase was comparable with the isolated femoral fracture (group FF: IL-6 preoperative, 52 pg/mL +/- 12 pg/mL; 7 hours, 78 pg/mL +/- 14 pg/mL; and 24 hours, 120 pg/mL +/- 23 pg/mL, p = 0.02). The changes observed after spinal fracture fixations (group SF) were considerably lower (IL-6 preoperative: 11 pg/mL +/- 6 pg/mL, 7 hours: 16 pg/mL +/- 11 pg/mL, and 24 hours: 56 pg/mL +/- 19 pg/mL). The percent change of baseline IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations, and the blood loss in group PAF at 24 hours were positively correlated (IL-6 r = 0.72, p < 0.03, IL-8 0.67, p = 004) after insertion. No correlation with the duration of surgery was found. CONCLUSIONS: The release of proinflammatory cytokines was higher in patients when their pelvic fractures were operated than in patients with spine fracture fixations, and was associated with the degree of blood loss. A higher increase in cytokine levels occurred when they were performed early (day 1-2) across all patient groups. The level of the released markers seems to be related to the magnitude of surgery, rather than to the duration of the procedure. This study supports the value of immunologic markers in determining subclinical changes during and after orthopedic surgical procedures.
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	00225282
Issue Number	6
Volume Number	65
e-ISSN	15298809
Journal	The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Language	English
Publisher	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publisher Date	2008-12-01
Publisher Place	United States
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Subject Keyword	Prospective Studies Humans Middle Aged Fractures, Bone Trauma Centers Male Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary Spinal Fusion Blood Journal Article Interleukin-6 Wounds, Nonpenetrating Blood Loss, Surgical Immunology Surgery Spinal Fractures Fracture Fixation, Internal Adult Female Injuries Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Femoral Fractures Acetabulum Discipline Traumatology Physiopathology Pelvic Bones Adolescent Multicenter Study Aged Cohort Studies
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Surgery Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in