NDLI: Student selected components: do students learn what teachers think they teach?

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Year: 2017 Volume: 39

Year: 2016 Volume: 38

Year: 2015 Volume: 37

Year: 2014 Volume: 36

Year: 2013 Volume: 35

Year: 2012 Volume: 34

Year: 2011 Volume: 33

Year: 2010 Volume: 32

Year: 2009 Volume: 31

Year: 2008 Volume: 30

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 8

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 7

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 6

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 5

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 4

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 3

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 2

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 1

Year: 2008 Volume: 30 Issue: 9-10

Promoting evidence based medicine in preclinical medical students via a federated literature search tool.

The potential of the inventory of learning styles to study students' learning patterns in three types of medical curricula.

Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching.

What is a clinical pearl and what is its role in medical education?

Preparing medical students to become skilled at clinical observation.

Is there a place for medical students in research laboratories? A student's perspective.

Reflective learning and the Net Generation.

Student selected components: do students learn what teachers think they teach?

Public health education in Ege University Medical Faculty: developing a community-oriented model.

Implementation of a competency-based residency curriculum: experiences from a resource-limited environment in the Caribbean.

Strengthening public health medicine training for medical students: development and evaluation of a lifestyle curriculum.

Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students.

Critical care recognition, management and communication skills during an emergency medicine clerkship.

Death by PowerPoint - the need for a 'fidget index'.

Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.

Medical education in Japan: a challenge to the healthcare system.

Formative evaluation of a pediatric digital library's educational content and comparison to national curricular standards.

eMedical Teacher.

Year: 2007 Volume: 29

Year: 2000 Volume: 22

Year: 1999 Volume: 21

Year: 1984 Volume: 6

Year: 1983 Volume: 5

Year: 1982 Volume: 4

Year: 1981 Volume: 3

Year: 1980 Volume: 2

Year: 1979 Volume: 1

Student selected components: do students learn what teachers think they teach?

Content Provider	World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus
Author	Murphy, Michael J. Seneviratne, Rohini De A. McAleer, Sean P. Remers, Olga J. Davis, Margery H.
Description	Country affiliation: United kingdom Author Affiliation: Murphy MJ ( Division of Pathology & Neuroscience, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK. m.j.murphy@dundee.ac.uk)
Abstract	BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that what teachers teach and what students learn may not be the same. This applies to all parts of the undergraduate medical curriculum, but may be especially relevant to student selected components, which vary substantially in their educational content. This has not been studied previously. AIMS: To compare perceptions of students and supervisors in relation to learning outcomes addressed by student selected components, and thus to examine differences between what is taught and what is learned. METHODS: Supervisors (n = 69) were asked to indicate which of twelve learning outcomes they felt were components of teaching and assessment. Upon completion of each SSC, students were required to complete the same outcomes template as part of their feedback (n = 644). Perceptions were compared in two ways: (1) a colour-coded 'traffic-light' system was used to record agreement/disagreement between students and supervisors of individual SSCs; (2) differences in perception of outcomes across the entire SSC programme were compared using the chi(2) statistic. RESULTS: (1) The 'traffic-light' system readily identified individual SSCs where significant disagreement existed and which were subject to further scrutiny. (2) More students than supervisors thought that outcome 2 (competent to perform practical procedures) was a component of teaching and assessment (41.8% v 27.5%, chi(2) = 5.24, p = 0.02), whereas more supervisors than students thought that outcome 6 (competent in communication skills) (97.1% v 82.1%, chi(2) = 6.91, p = 0.009) and outcome 7 (competent to retrieve and handle information) (100% v 93.7%, chi(2) = 4.8, p = 0.02) were. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disagreement exists about the outcomes addressed by SSCs, suggesting that students do not always learn what teachers think they teach. The use of two complementary approaches allows global and individual comparisons to be drawn and thus provides a powerful tool to address this important issue.
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	0142159X
Issue Number	9-10
Volume Number	30
e-ISSN	1466187X
Journal	Medical Teacher
Language	English
Publisher	Taylor & Francis
Publisher Date	2008-01-01
Publisher Place	Great Britain (UK)
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Faculty Psychology Humans Students, Medical Discipline Medical Education Journal Article Competency-based Education Teaching Learning Great Britain Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Measurement Perception Self-assessment Evaluation Studies Methods
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Education Medicine

Central Library (ISO-9001:2015 Certified)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India | PIN - 721302

See location in the Map
03222 282435
Mail: support@ndl.gov.in

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in