Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus |
|---|---|
| Author | Reeves, David Hann, Mark Rick, Jo Rowe, Kelly Small, Nicola Burt, Jenni Roland, Martin Protheroe, Joanne Blakeman, Tom Richardson, Gerry Kennedy, Anne Bower, Peter |
| Description | Author Affiliation: Reeves D ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Hann M ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Rick J ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Rowe K ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Small N ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Burt J ( Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.); Roland M ( Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.); Protheroe J ( Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele.); Blakeman T ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.); Richardson G ( Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York.); Kennedy A ( Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton.); Bower P ( NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester.) |
| Abstract | BACKGROUND: In the UK, the use of care planning and written care plans has been proposed to improve the management of long-term conditions, yet there is limited evidence concerning their uptake and benefits. AIM: To explore the implementation of care plans and care planning in the UK and associations with the process and outcome of care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A controlled prospective cohort study among two groups of patients with long-term conditions who were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics, but who were registered with general practices varying in their implementation of care plans and care planning. METHOD: Implementation of care plans and care planning in general practice was assessed using the 2009-2010 GP Patient Survey, and relationships with patient outcomes (self-management and vitality) were examined using multilevel, mixed effects linear regression modelling. RESULTS: The study recruited 38 practices and 2439 patients. Practices in the two groups (high and low users of written documents) were similar in structural and population characteristics. Patients in the two groups of practices were similar in demographics and baseline health. Patients did demonstrate significant differences in reported experiences of care planning, although the differences were modest. Very few patients in the cohort reported a written plan that could be confirmed. Analysis of outcomes suggested that most patients show limited change over time in vitality and self-management. Variation in the use of care plans at the practice level was very limited and not related to patient outcomes over time. CONCLUSION: The use of written care plans in patients with long-term conditions is uncommon and unlikely to explain a substantive amount of variation in the process and outcome of care. More proactive efforts at implementation may be required to provide a rigorous test of the potential of care plans and care planning. |
| File Format | HTM / HTML |
| ISSN | 09601643 |
| e-ISSN | 14785242 |
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14X681385 |
| Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
| Issue Number | 626 |
| Volume Number | 64 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
| Publisher Date | 2014-09-01 |
| Publisher Place | Great Britain (UK) |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Therapy Research Support, Non-u.s. Gov't Prospective Studies Discipline Family Medicine Attitude Of Health Personnel Epidemiology Patient Satisfaction Organization & Administration Patient Care Planning Physician-patient Relations Primary Health Care Statistics & Numerical Data Health Policy Chronic Disease Health Care Surveys |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Family Practice |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|