NDLI: A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.

Content Provider	World Health Organization (WHO)-Global Index Medicus
Author	Buckley, Jack C. Brown, Adam P. Shin, John S. Rogers, Kirsten M. Hoftman, Nir N.
Description	Author Affiliation: Buckley JC ( From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.)
Abstract	BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube security is a critical safety issue. We compared the mobility of an in situ endotracheal tube secured with adhesive tape to the one secured with a new commercially available purpose-designed endotracheal tube-holder device (Haider Tube-Guard). We also observed for the incidence of oropharyngeal or facial trauma associated with the 2 tube fixation methods. METHODS: Thirty adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade were prospectively enrolled. Immediately after intubation, a single study author positioned the endotracheal tube tip in the distal trachea using a bronchoscope. Anesthesiologists caring for patients secured the tube in their normal fashion (always with adhesive tape). A force transducer was used to apply linear force, increasing to 15 N or until the principal investigator deemed that the force be aborted for safety reasons. The displacement of the endotracheal tube was measured with the bronchoscope. Any tape was then removed and the endotracheal tube secured with the Haider Tube-Guard device. The linear force was reapplied and the displacement of the endotracheal tube measured. The Haider Tube-Guard device was left in place for the duration of the case. The patient's face and oropharynx were examined for any evidence of trauma during surgery and in the recovery room. On discharge from the postanesthesia care unit, the patient answered a brief survey assessing for any subjective evidence of minor facial or oropharyngeal trauma. RESULTS: Under standardized tension, the endotracheal tube withdrew a mean distance of 3.4 cm when secured with adhesive tape versus 0.3 cm when secured with the Haider Tube-Guard (P <0.001). Ninety-seven percent of patients (29/30) experienced clinically significant endotracheal tube movement (>1 cm) when adhesive tape was used to secure the tube versus 3% (1/30) when the Haider Tube-Guard was used (P <0.001). Thirty percent of patients (9/30) were potentially deemed a high extubation risk (endotracheal tube movement >4 cm) when the endotracheal tube was secured with tape versus 0% (0/30) when secured with the Haider Tube-Guard (P = 0.004). Six patients with taped endotracheal tubes required the traction to be aborted before 15 N of force was achieved to prevent potential extubation as the tape either separated from the face or stretched to allow excessive endotracheal tube movement. None of the patients appeared to sustain any injury from the Haider Tube-Guard device. CONCLUSIONS: The Haider Tube-Guard significantly reduced the mobility of the endotracheal tube when compared with adhesive tape and was well tolerated in our observations.
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	00032999
e-ISSN	15267598
DOI	10.1213/ANE.0000000000001222
Journal	Anesthesia & Analgesia
Issue Number	5
Volume Number	122
Language	English
Publisher	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publisher Date	2016-05-01
Publisher Place	United States
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Discipline Anesthesiology Airway Extubation Chest Tubes Foreign-body Migration Prevention & Control Intubation, Intratracheal Instrumentation Surgical Tape Anesthesia, General Bronchoscopy Equipment Design Facial Injuries Etiology Adverse Effects Neuromuscular Blockade Oropharynx Injuries Patient Positioning Prospective Studies Risk Factors Questionnaires Clinical Trial Comparative Study Research Support, Non-u.s. Gov't
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation

A study of tape adhesive strength on endotracheal tubes

Homemade rubber spacer for endotracheal tube holder.

Assessment of neuromuscular blockade in children at the time of block reversal and the removal of the endotracheal tube.

Reversal of profound neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex after failure of rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: a case report.

Extubation force depends upon angle of force application and fixation technique: a study of 7 methods

In reply: advantage of Parker Flex-tip Tube(®) in endotracheal intubation using AirwayScope(®) videolaryngoscope.

Obstruction of naso-endotracheal tube by inferior turbinate.

Securing tracheal tubes in facial burns.

A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.

Similar Documents

A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation

A study of tape adhesive strength on endotracheal tubes

Homemade rubber spacer for endotracheal tube holder.

Assessment of neuromuscular blockade in children at the time of block reversal and the removal of the endotracheal tube.

Reversal of profound neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex after failure of rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: a case report.

Extubation force depends upon angle of force application and fixation technique: a study of 7 methods

In reply: advantage of Parker Flex-tip Tube(®) in endotracheal intubation using AirwayScope(®) videolaryngoscope.

Obstruction of naso-endotracheal tube by inferior turbinate.

Securing tracheal tubes in facial burns.

A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.