NDLI: Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Volume 89, 2018

Volume 88, 2017

Volume 87, 2016

Volume 86, 2015

Volume 85, 2014

Volume: 85 Issue: 11

Volume: 85 Issue: 10

Volume: 85 Issue: 9

Medial tibial stress syndrome: A skeleton from medieval Rhodes demonstrates the appearance of the bone surface – a case report

Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines

Body mass index and risk of perioperative cardiovascular adverse events and mortality in 34,744 Danish patients undergoing hip or knee replacement

Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty

Wear of a sequentially annealed polyethylene acetabular liner

Comparison of extracapsular pseudotumors seen in magnetic resonance imaging and in revision surgery of 167 failed metal-on-metal hip replacements

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Role of preoperative pain, muscle function, and activity level in discharge readiness after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: Acta Orthopaedica: Vol 85, No 5

Risk of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of total hip and knee arthroplasty in fast-track departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease and the risk of ADHD, depression, and mortality

The acetabulum in Perthes’ disease: Inter-observer agreement and reliability of radiographic measurements

Tibial fractures in children

Prevalence and clinical significance of occult fractures in children with radiograph-negative acute ankle injury

Incidence of fractures requiring inpatient care

Mechanical properties of a cemented porous implant interface

Thermal epiphysiodesis performed with radio frequency in a porcine model

Sequence of the Essex-Lopresti lesion‣a high-speed video documentation and kinematic analysis

Volume: 85 Issue: 8

Volume: 85 Issue: 7

Volume: 85 Issue: 6

Volume: 85 Issue: 5

Volume: 85 Issue: 4

Volume: 85 Issue: 3

Volume: 85 Issue: 2

Volume: 85 Issue: 1

Volume 84, 2013

Volume 83, 2012

Volume 82, 2011

Volume 81, 2010

Volume 80, 2009

Volume 79, 2008

Volume 78, 2007

Volume 77, 2006

Volume 76, 2005

Volume 75, 2004

Volume 74, 2003

Volume 73, 2002

Volume 72, 2001

Volume 71, 2001

Volume 70, 1999

Volume 69, 1998

Volume 68, 1997

Volume 67, 1996

Volume 66, 1995

Volume 65, 1994

Volume 64, 1993

Volume 63, 1992

Volume 62, 1991

Volume 61, 1990

Volume 60, 1989

Volume 59, 1988

Volume 58, 1987

Volume 57, 1986

Volume 56, 1985

Volume 55, 1984

Volume 54, 1983

Volume 53, 1982

Volume 52, 1981

Volume 51, 1980

Volume 50, 1979

Volume 49, 1978

Volume 48, 1977

Volume 47, 1976

Volume 46, 1975

Volume 45, 1974

Volume 44, 1973

Volume 43, 1972

Volume 42, 1971

Volume 41, 1970

Volume 40, 1969

Volume 39, 1968

Volume 38, 1967

Volume 37, 1966

Volume 36, 1965

Volume 35, 1965

Volume 34, 1964

Volume 33, 1963

Volume 32, 1962

Volume 31, 1960

Volume 30, 1959

Volume 29, 1958

Volume 28, 1958

Volume 27, 1957

Volume 26, 1956

Volume 25, 1955

Volume 24, 1953

Volume 23, 1953

Volume 22, 1952

Volume 21, 1950

Volume 20, 1951

Volume 19, 1950

Volume 18, 1949

Volume 17, 1948

Volume 16, 1945

Volume 15, 1944

Volume 14, 1943

Volume 13, 1942

Volume 12, 1941

Volume 11, 1940

Volume 10, 1939

Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty

Content Provider	Taylor & Francis Online
Author	Nordsletten, Lars Amlie, Einar Baste, Valborg Furnes, Ove Hovik, Oystein Dimmen, Sigbjorn Havelin, Leif I.
Abstract	Background — The surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often based on surgeon preference and local traditions. The anterior muscle-sparing approach has recently gained popularity in Europe. We tested the hypothesis that patient satisfaction, pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after THA is not related to the surgical approach. Patients — 1,476 patients identified through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register were sent questionnaires 1–3 years after undergoing THA in the period from January 2008 to June 2010. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), visual analog scales (VAS) addressing pain and satisfaction, and questions about complications. 1,273 patients completed the questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Results — Adjusted HOOS scores for pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), sport/recreation, and quality of life were significantly worse (p < 0.001 to p = 0.03) for the lateral approach than for the anterior approach and the posterolateral approach (mean differences: 3.2–5.0). These results were related to more patient-reported limping with the lateral approach than with the anterior and posterolateral approaches (25% vs. 12% and 13%, respectively; p < 0.001). Interpretation — Patients operated with the lateral approach reported worse outcomes 1–3 years after THA surgery. Self-reported limping occurred twice as often in patients who underwent THA with a lateral approach than in those who underwent THA with an anterior or posterolateral approach. There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes after THA between those who underwent THA with a posterolateral approach and those who underwent THA with an anterior approach.
Starting Page	463
Ending Page	469
Page Count	7
File Format	PDF HTM / HTML
ISSN	17453674 17453682
DOI	10.3109/17453674.2014.934183
Journal	Acta Orthopaedica
Volume Number	85
Issue Number	5
Language	English
Publisher	Taylor & Francis
Publisher Date	2014-09-30
Access Restriction	Open
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery

Central Library (ISO-9001:2015 Certified)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Kharagpur, West Bengal, India | PIN - 721302

See location in the Map
03222 282435
Mail: support@ndl.gov.in

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in