Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | Springer Nature : SpringerOpen |
|---|---|
| Author | Mikkelsen, Laura Bjerg Wedderkopp, Niels Mose, Louise Schlosser |
| Abstract | Internationally, patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly applied in clinical settings to patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current literature does not provide an understanding of the patient experience with these tools, as remarkably few studies are published investigating patient perspectives on completing PROMs. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate patient experiences, perspectives, and understanding with usage of PROMs for total hip and total knee arthroplasty in a Danish orthopedic clinic. Patients who were scheduled for, or recently had, a THA or TKA for primary osteoarthritis were recruited to participate in individual interviews, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis was based on qualitative content analysis. In total, 33 adult patients (18 female) were interviewed. Average age was 70.15 (range 52–86). The following themes were derived from the analysis: a) motivation and demotivation for completion, b) to complete a PROM questionnaire, c) environment for completion, and d) suggestions for use of PROMs. The majority of participants scheduled for TKA/THA were not fully aware of the purpose of completing PROMs. Motivation to do so arose from a desire to help others. Demotivation was affected by inabilities to use electronic technology. In terms of completing PROMs, participants expressed varied ease of use, and some perceived technical challenges. The participants expressed satisfaction with the flexibility of completing PROMs in outpatient clinics or at home; nevertheless, some did not manage completion on their own. Help was of great importance for completion, especially for participants with limited electronic capabilities. |
| Related Links | https://jpro.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s41687-023-00561-3 |
| Ending Page | 11 |
| Page Count | 11 |
| Starting Page | 1 |
| ISSN | 25098020 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-023-00561-3 |
| Journal | Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
| Issue Number | 1 |
| Volume Number | 7 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | SpringerOpen |
| Publisher Date | 2023-03-02 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) Hip and knee arthroplasty Patient experience Interview |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Health Informatics Health Information Management |
| Aim | The Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes (JPRO) is an international, open-access, multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to advancing the science and practice of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). JPRO publishes high-quality original research, and serves as a leader in the field, providing innovative insights and methodologies with broad cross-disciplinary relevance.JPRO welcomes submissions of original research articles, comprehensive literature reviews, brief communications, commentaries, editorials, and reviews of recent books and software advances relevant to the topics described below. Submissions should demonstrate innovation, employ novel methodologies, or significantly contribute to the advancement of PROs science. Manuscripts reporting results with broad implications across disciplines are particularly encouraged.Note: JPRO generally does not publish case reports, study protocols, or pilot and feasibility studies.The journal uses the ISOQOL Dictionary of Quality of Life and Health Outcomes Measurement definitions of PROs, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).1Listed below are some examples of the types of papers to be considered for publication in JPRO.DefinitionsPatient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)A measurement of any aspect of a patient’s health that comes directly from the patient without interpretation of the patient's responses by a physician or anyone else. A distinction can be made between those outcomes for which no other interpretation is valid, such as the rating of symptoms or difficulty in carrying out an activity, and those outcomes where verification is possible. For example, the patient can be a good source of information on limitations in physical function, but if need be, the information reported on could be verified by observed performance. The term Self-reported Outcome (SRO) would better represent this type of construct.Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs)Measures related to patient-centered care that cover aspects of the structure and processes of care as experienced by the patient and not interpreted by any other person. Dimensions of the patient experience covered by PREMs include respect for patients’ values and preferences; provision of information, communication and education; coordination of care; involvement of family; emotional support; physical comfort; preparation for discharge, continuity and transitions in care; and access. In the hospital context, PREMs cover aspects of care such as communication and responsiveness of health professionals, cleanliness and quietness of the environment, pain management, and adequacy of discharge information. PREMs are distinct from measures of satisfaction as the latter is strongly affected by expectations and outcomes2.1. Mayo NE. ISOQOL Dictionary of Quality of Life and Health Outcomes Measurement: Isoqol; 2015.2. Bull C, Teede H, Watson D, Callander EJ. Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(4):e220326. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 2.9/2024 |
| 5-Year Journal Impact Factor | 3.2/2024 |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|