NDLI: Eight characteristics of rigorous multilevel implementation research: a step-by-step guide

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Williams, Nathaniel J. Ehrhart, Mark G. Willging, Cathleen E. Bunger, Alicia C. Beidas, Rinad S. Aarons, Gregory A.
Abstract	Background Although healthcare is delivered in inherently multilevel contexts, implementation science has no widely endorsed methodological standards defining the characteristics of rigorous, multilevel implementation research. We identify and describe eight characteristics of high-quality, multilevel implementation research to encourage discussion, spur debate, and guide decision-making around study design and methodological issues. Recommendations Implementation researchers who conduct rigorous multilevel implementation research demonstrate the following eight characteristics. First, they map and operationalize the specific multilevel context for defined populations and settings. Second, they define and state the level of each construct under study. Third, they describe how constructs relate to each other within and across levels. Fourth, they specify the temporal scope of each phenomenon at each relevant level. Fifth, they align measurement choices and construction of analytic variables with the levels of theories selected (and hypotheses generated, if applicable). Sixth, they use a sampling strategy consistent with the selected theories or research objectives and sufficiently large and variable to examine relationships at requisite levels. Seventh, they align analytic approaches with the chosen theories (and hypotheses, if applicable), ensuring that they account for measurement dependencies and nested data structures. Eighth, they ensure inferences are made at the appropriate level. To guide implementation researchers and encourage debate, we present the rationale for each characteristic, actionable recommendations for operationalizing the characteristics in implementation research, a range of examples, and references to make the characteristics more usable. Our recommendations apply to all types of multilevel implementation study designs and approaches, including randomized trials, quantitative and qualitative observational studies, and mixed methods. Conclusion These eight characteristics provide benchmarks for evaluating the quality and replicability of multilevel implementation research and promote a common language and reference points. This, in turn, facilitates knowledge generation across diverse multilevel settings and ensures that implementation research is consistent with (and appropriately leverages) what has already been learned in allied multilevel sciences. When a shared and integrated description of what constitutes rigor is defined and broadly communicated, implementation science is better positioned to innovate both methodologically and theoretically.
Related Links	https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13012-023-01302-2.pdf
Ending Page	16
Page Count	16
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	17485908
DOI	10.1186/s13012-023-01302-2
Journal	Implementation Science
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	18
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2023-10-23
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Health Services Research Public Health Health Informatics Health Policy Health Administration Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Multilevel Research methods Research reporting Guideline Research best practices
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Health Policy Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Health Informatics
Journal Impact Factor	8.8/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	9.2/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Enhancing the reporting of implementation research

Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review

Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting

Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice

Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications: our aims, scope, and reporting expectations

Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation: three "6th NIH Meetings" on training, measures, and methods

Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures

Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice

A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox

Eight characteristics of rigorous multilevel implementation research: a step-by-step guide

Similar Documents

Enhancing the reporting of implementation research

Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review

Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting

Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice

Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications: our aims, scope, and reporting expectations

Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation: three "6th NIH Meetings" on training, measures, and methods

Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures

Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice

A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox

Eight characteristics of rigorous multilevel implementation research: a step-by-step guide