NDLI: Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Cappello, Leonardo Alghilan, Waleed Gabardi, Massimiliano Leonardis, Daniele Barsotti, Michele Frisoli, Antonio Cipriani, Christian
Abstract	Background Human sensorimotor control of dexterous manipulation relies on afferent sensory signals. Explicit tactile feedback is generally not available to prosthetic hand users, who have to rely on incidental information sources to partly close the control loop, resulting in suboptimal performance and manipulation difficulty. Recent studies on non-invasive supplementary sensory feedback indicated that time-discrete vibrational feedback delivered upon relevant mechanical events outperforms continuous tactile feedback. However, we hypothesize that continuous tactile feedback can be more effective in non-routine manipulation tasks (i.e., tasks where the grip force is modified reactively in response to the sensory feedback due to the unpredictable behavior of the manipulated object, such as picking and holding a virtual fragile object) if delivered to highly sensitive areas. We further hypothesize that this continuous tactile feedback is not necessary during all the duration of the manipulation task, since adaptation occurs. Methods We investigated the effectiveness of continuous tactile feedback in precision manipulation, together with a new sensory feedback policy, where the continuous tactile feedback is gradually removed when the grasp reaches a steady state (namely, transient tactile feedback). We carried out an experiment in a virtual-reality setting with custom tactile feedback devices, which can apply continuous pressure and vibrations, attached to the thumb and index finger. We enrolled 24 healthy participants and instructed them to pick and hold a fragile virtual cube without breaking it. We compared their manipulation performance when using four different sensory feedback methods, i.e., no tactile feedback, discrete vibrations, continuous tactile feedback, and transient tactile feedback. The latter consisted of gradually removing the continuous feedback in the static phase of the grasp. Results Continuous tactile feedback leads to a significantly larger number of successful trials than discrete vibrational cues and no feedback conditions, yet the gradual removal of the continuous feedback yields to comparable outcomes. Moreover, the participants preferred the continuous stimuli over the vibrational cues and the removal in the static phase did not significantly impact their appreciation of the continuous tactile feedback. Conclusions These results advocate for the use of continuous supplementary tactile feedback for fine manipulation control and indicate that it can seamlessly be removed in the static phase of the grasp, possibly due to the mechanism of sensory adaptation. This encourages the development of energy-efficient supplementary feedback devices for prosthetic and telemanipulation applications, where encumbrance and power consumption are burdensome constraints.
Related Links	https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12984-020-00736-9.pdf
Ending Page	13
Page Count	13
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	17430003
DOI	10.1186/s12984-020-00736-9
Journal	Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	17
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2020-08-28
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Neurosciences Neurology Rehabilitation Medicine Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Sensory feedback Tactile feedback Feedforward control Haptics Sensorimotor control
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Health Informatics Rehabilitation
Journal Impact Factor	5.2/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	5.6/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback

The effect of tactile augmentation on manipulation and grip force control during force-field adaptation

Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation

The sensory feedback mechanisms enabling couples to walk synchronously: An initial investigation

Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study

A pilot study of sensory feedback by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to improve manipulation deficit caused by severe sensory loss after stroke

Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review

Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots

The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control

Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation

Similar Documents

Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback

The effect of tactile augmentation on manipulation and grip force control during force-field adaptation

Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation

The sensory feedback mechanisms enabling couples to walk synchronously: An initial investigation

Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study

A pilot study of sensory feedback by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to improve manipulation deficit caused by severe sensory loss after stroke

Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review

Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots

The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control

Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation