NDLI: Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Hernandez-Villafuerte, Karla Sussex, Jon Robin, Enora Guthrie, Sue Wooding, Steve
Abstract	Background Publicly funded biomedical and health research is expected to achieve the best return possible for taxpayers and for society generally. It is therefore important to know whether such research is more productive if concentrated into a small number of ‘research groups’ or dispersed across many. Methods We undertook a systematic rapid evidence assessment focused on the research question: do economies of scale and scope exist in biomedical and health research? In other words, is that research more productive per unit of cost if more of it, or a wider variety of it, is done in one location? We reviewed English language literature without date restriction to the end of 2014. To help us to classify and understand that literature, we first undertook a review of econometric literature discussing models for analysing economies of scale and/or scope in research generally (not limited to biomedical and health research). Results We found a large and disparate literature. We reviewed 60 empirical studies of (dis-)economies of scale and/or scope in biomedical and health research, or in categories of research including or overlapping with biomedical and health research. This literature is varied in methods and findings. At the level of universities or research institutes, studies more often point to positive economies of scale than to diseconomies of scale or constant returns to scale in biomedical and health research. However, all three findings exist in the literature, along with inverse U-shaped relationships. At the level of individual research units, laboratories or projects, the numbers of studies are smaller and evidence is mixed. Concerning economies of scope, the literature more often suggests positive economies of scope than diseconomies, but the picture is again mixed. The effect of varying the scope of activities by a research group was less often reported than the effect of scale and the results were more mixed. Conclusions The absence of predominant findings for or against the existence of economies of scale or scope implies a continuing need for case by case decisions when distributing research funding, rather than a general policy either to concentrate funding in a few centres or to disperse it across many.
Related Links	https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12961-016-0167-3.pdf
Ending Page	17
Page Count	17
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14784505
DOI	10.1186/s12961-016-0167-3
Journal	Health Research Policy and Systems
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	15
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2017-02-02
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Health Administration R & D Technology Policy Medicine Public Health Health Services Research Health Policy Economies of scale Economies of scope Biomedical and health research R & D/Technology Policy Medicine/Public Health
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Review
Subject	Health Policy
Journal Impact Factor	3.6/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	4.3/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

The impact generated by publicly and charity-funded research in the United Kingdom: a systematic literature review

Using an equity-based framework for evaluating publicly funded health insurance programmes as an instrument of UHC in Chhattisgarh State, India

New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature

Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review

A novel approach to sharing all available information from funded health research: the NIHR Journals Library

Catastrophic health expenditure of inpatients in emerging economies: evidence from the Indian subcontinent

Research evidence use in local government-led public health interventions: a systematic review

Evidence for Health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice

Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review

Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature

Similar Documents

The impact generated by publicly and charity-funded research in the United Kingdom: a systematic literature review

Using an equity-based framework for evaluating publicly funded health insurance programmes as an instrument of UHC in Chhattisgarh State, India

New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature

Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review

A novel approach to sharing all available information from funded health research: the NIHR Journals Library

Catastrophic health expenditure of inpatients in emerging economies: evidence from the Indian subcontinent

Research evidence use in local government-led public health interventions: a systematic review

Evidence for Health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice

Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review

Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature