NDLI: Coaching to develop leadership of healthcare managers: a mixed-methods systematic review

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Hu, Shuang Välimäki, Maritta Liu, Siying Li, Xianhong Shumaila, Batool Huang, Wenqiu Liu, Xincen Guo, Wendi Chen, Wenjun Chen, Jia Hu, Jiale
Abstract	Introduction Coaching is commonly used to facilitate leadership development among healthcare managers. However, there is limited knowledge of the components of coaching interventions and their impacts on healthcare managers’ leadership development. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence of coaching to develop leadership among healthcare managers. Methods The authors conducted a mixed-methods systematic review using a convergent synthesis design where quantitative and qualitative evidence was collected and analyzed concurrently using a matrix synthesis method. They reviewed studies published in English or Chinese by searching databases including MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Nursing & Allied Health Premium, Scopus, Wanfang, CNKI, SinoMed, and VIP databases from their inception to August 10, 2023, and updated the search again on July 9, 2024. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. First, from eligible studies, the qualitative data were extracted to describe intervention components, the perceived impact of coaching, and participants’ perceptions of being involved in coaching intervention. Second, quantitative data analysis was conducted to describe the impact of coaching interventions and the frequency of each theme evolved in the data. Third, qualitative and quantitative data were synthesized using the matrix synthesis method. Results A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. Three qualitative studies were assessed as having ‘no or few limitations’, three case series studies were scored between five and eight out of 10 points, two quasi-experimental studies showed ‘moderate’ overall bias, and the five mixed-methods studies scored from 40 to 60% (out of 100%). For Objective 1, which covers the component of coaching (aims, ingredients, mechanism, and delivery), the typical aim of coaching interventions was to develop the leadership skills of middle management managers. The ingredients of coaching encompassed three distinct coaching categories and seven specific procedures. The mechanisms of most coaching interventions were based on theory and empirical evidence. The average delivery time was approximately four months. Overall, coaching positively impacts outcomes for managers, organizations, and staff (Objective 2). Perceptions of the participants toward coaching interventions were divided into six categories: barriers, facilitators, effective components, attitudes, satisfactory aspects, and suggestions for designing high-quality coaching interventions to improve leadership (Objective 3). Conclusions The components of coaching interventions varied across different studies. The impact of coaching on leadership development was positive across three levels (manager, organization, and staff). Therefore, we recommend coaching as an intervention for healthcare managers aiming to enhance their leadership level. Future coaching interventions may achieve greater effectiveness if they are specifically aligned with the participants’ perceptions identified in our study.
Related Links	https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12909-024-06081-y.pdf
Ending Page	16
Page Count	16
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14726920
DOI	10.1186/s12909-024-06081-y
Journal	BMC Medical Education
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	24
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2024-10-01
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Medical Education Theory of Medicine Bioethics Coaching Leadership Healthcare managers Systematic review Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Education Medicine
Journal Impact Factor	2.7/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	3.4/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Coaching to develop leadership for healthcare managers: a mixed-method systematic review protocol

The impact of community engaged healthcare education on undergraduate students’ empathy and their views towards social accountability; a mixed methods systematic review

Leadership training programs in graduate medical education: a systematic review

Leadership in healthcare education

Systematic review—understanding the barriers and facilitators experienced by healthcare professionals in providing care for tics: a mixed methods systematic review of clinical knowledge, attitudes, and practices

Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study

Integrated secure messaging to enhance medical education: a mixed methods study

Delivering medical leadership training through the Healthcare Leadership Academy: a four year analysis

Outcomes of interprofessional education for pharmacy students: a systematic review

Coaching to develop leadership of healthcare managers: a mixed-methods systematic review

Similar Documents

Coaching to develop leadership for healthcare managers: a mixed-method systematic review protocol

The impact of community engaged healthcare education on undergraduate students’ empathy and their views towards social accountability; a mixed methods systematic review

Leadership training programs in graduate medical education: a systematic review

Leadership in healthcare education

Systematic review—understanding the barriers and facilitators experienced by healthcare professionals in providing care for tics: a mixed methods systematic review of clinical knowledge, attitudes, and practices

Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study

Integrated secure messaging to enhance medical education: a mixed methods study

Delivering medical leadership training through the Healthcare Leadership Academy: a four year analysis

Outcomes of interprofessional education for pharmacy students: a systematic review

Coaching to develop leadership of healthcare managers: a mixed-methods systematic review