NDLI: GP’s perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Elwenspoek, Martha M. C. Mann, Ed Alsop, Katharine Clark, Hannah Patel, Rita Watson, Jessica C. Whiting, Penny
Abstract	Background We have shown previously that current recommendations in UK guidelines for monitoring long-term conditions are largely based on expert opinion. Due to a lack of robust evidence on optimal monitoring strategies and testing intervals, the guidelines are unclear and incomplete. This uncertainty may underly variation in testing that has been observed across the UK between GP practices and regions. Methods Our objective was to audit current testing practices of GPs in the UK; in particular, perspectives on laboratory tests for monitoring long-term conditions, the workload, and how confident GPs are in ordering and interpreting these tests. We designed an online survey consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions that was promoted on social media and in newsletters targeting GPs practicing in UK. The survey was live between October–November 2019. The results were analysed using a mixed-methods approach. Results The survey was completed by 550 GPs, of whom 69% had more than 10 years of experience. The majority spent more than 30 min per day on testing (78%), but only half of the respondents felt confident in dealing with abnormal results (53%). There was a high level of disagreement for whether liver function tests and full blood counts should be done ‘routinely’, ‘sometimes’, or ‘never’ in patients with a certain long-term condition. The free text comments revealed three common themes: (1) pressures that promote over-testing, i.e. guidelines or protocols, workload from secondary care, fear of missing something, patient expectations; (2) negative consequences of over-testing, i.e. increased workload and patient harm; and (3) uncertainties due to lack of evidence and unclear guidelines. Conclusion These results confirm the variation that has been observed in test ordering data. The results also show that most GPs spent a significant part of their day ordering and interpreting monitoring tests. The lack of confidence in knowing how to act on abnormal test results underlines the urgent need for robust evidence on optimal testing and the development of clear and unambiguous testing recommendations. Uncertainties surrounding optimal testing has resulted in an over-use of tests, which leads to a waste of resources, increased GP workload and potential patient harm.
Related Links	https://bmcprimcare.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12875-020-01331-6.pdf
Ending Page	10
Page Count	10
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	27314553
DOI	10.1186/s12875-020-01331-6
Journal	BMC Primary Care
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	21
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2020-12-05
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	General Practice Family Medicine Primary Care Medicine Optimal testing Chronic disease monitoring
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Family Practice
Journal Impact Factor	3.2/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	3.3/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditions

“Was that a success or not a success?”: a qualitative study of health professionals’ perspectives on support for people with long-term conditions

A qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in Hong Kong

Measuring patient-perceived continuity of care for patients with long-term conditions in primary care

Identifying populations with chronic pain in primary care: developing an algorithm and logic rules applied to coded primary care diagnostic and medication data

What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review

Analyzing laboratory test utilization trends in belgian primary care: a decade of insights with international perspectives

General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study

How effective are allied health group interventions for the management of adults with long-term conditions? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and its applicability to the Australian primary health system

GP’s perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice

Similar Documents

Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditions

“Was that a success or not a success?”: a qualitative study of health professionals’ perspectives on support for people with long-term conditions

A qualitative study of the views of patients with long-term conditions on family doctors in Hong Kong

Measuring patient-perceived continuity of care for patients with long-term conditions in primary care

Identifying populations with chronic pain in primary care: developing an algorithm and logic rules applied to coded primary care diagnostic and medication data

What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review

Analyzing laboratory test utilization trends in belgian primary care: a decade of insights with international perspectives

General practitioners’ perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study

How effective are allied health group interventions for the management of adults with long-term conditions? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and its applicability to the Australian primary health system

GP’s perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice