NDLI: A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

Content Provider	Springer Nature : BioMed Central
Author	Viergever, Roderik F Olifson, Sylvie Ghaffar, Abdul Terry, Robert F
Abstract	Health research priority setting processes assist researchers and policymakers in effectively targeting research that has the greatest potential public health benefit. Many different approaches to health research prioritization exist, but there is no agreement on what might constitute best practice. Moreover, because of the many different contexts for which priorities can be set, attempting to produce one best practice is in fact not appropriate, as the optimal approach varies per exercise. Therefore, following a literature review and an analysis of health research priority setting exercises that were organized or coordinated by the World Health Organization since 2005, we propose a checklist for health research priority setting that allows for informed choices on different approaches and outlines nine common themes of good practice. It is intended to provide generic assistance for planning health research prioritization processes. The checklist explains what needs to be clarified in order to establish the context for which priorities are set; it reviews available approaches to health research priority setting; it offers discussions on stakeholder participation and information gathering; it sets out options for use of criteria and different methods for deciding upon priorities; and it emphasizes the importance of well-planned implementation, evaluation and transparency.
Related Links	https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1478-4505-8-36.pdf
Ending Page	9
Page Count	9
Starting Page	1
File Format	HTM / HTML
ISSN	14784505
DOI	10.1186/1478-4505-8-36
Journal	Health Research Policy and Systems
Issue Number	1
Volume Number	8
Language	English
Publisher	BioMed Central
Publisher Date	2010-12-15
Access Restriction	Open
Subject Keyword	Health Administration R & D Technology Policy Medicine Public Health Health Services Research Health Policy Health Research Priority Setting Priority Setting Process National Health Research System Research Priority Setting R & D/Technology Policy Medicine/Public Health
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Review
Subject	Health Policy
Journal Impact Factor	3.6/2023
5-Year Journal Impact Factor	4.3/2023

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

Priority setting and health policy and systems research

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap

A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting

Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015

Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

Evaluation of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group’s systematic review priority-setting project

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

Similar Documents

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

Priority setting and health policy and systems research

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice

On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap

A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting

Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015

Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

Evaluation of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group’s systematic review priority-setting project

A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice