NDLI: Regulation (EU) No. 542/2014 and the International Jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Author	Miguel Asensio, Pedro A.
Copyright Year	2014
Abstract	Regulation (EU) No. 542/2014 amends the Brussels I$^{bis}$ Regulation and establishes rules that govern, among other issues, the international jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and the recognition and enforcement of judgments given by the UPC in Member States of the Regulation that are not Contracting Parties to the UPC Agreement. Particular attention is paid to the new supplementary forum that enables the UPC to hear disputes involving defendants from third States that relate to an infringement of a European patent and give rise to damage inside as well as outside the Union. Granting jurisdiction to the UPC to adjudicate infringements outside the territory of the Contracting States to the UPC Agreement on the basis of an asset-related supplementary ground for jurisdiction like that established under the new Regulation seems questionable.
Starting Page	868
Ending Page	888
Page Count	21
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00189855
Journal	IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume Number	45
Issue Number	8
e-ISSN	21950237
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2014-11-18
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	International jurisdiction Patents Recognition and enforcement of judgments International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law Unified court
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Political Science and International Relations Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Regulation (EU) No 542/2014 and the International Jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court

A Unitary Patent for a (Dis)United Europe: The Long Shadow of History

“Wintersteiger III” : European Regulation 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Art. 5 No. 3; Design Protection Act, Sec. 10(a)

“Pinckney” : Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Art. 5(3) – Peter Pinckney v. KDG Mediatech AG

Extending the Limits of Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Data Outside the EU – Is There a Need to Rebalance?

“Bayer v. Natco” : Decision of the Bombay High Court 15 July 2014 – Writ Petition No. 1323 of 2013

“Access Rights” (Zugriffsrechte) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 October 2014 – Case No. X ZR 35/11

Reset and Go: The Unitary Patent System Post-Brexit

“Samsung v. Apple” : Decision of the Intellectual Property High Court 16 May 2014 – Case No. 2013 (Heisei 25) (ra) 10007 and 10008

Regulation (EU) No. 542/2014 and the International Jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court

Similar Documents

Regulation (EU) No 542/2014 and the International Jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court

A Unitary Patent for a (Dis)United Europe: The Long Shadow of History

“Wintersteiger III” : European Regulation 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Art. 5 No. 3; Design Protection Act, Sec. 10(a)

“Pinckney” : Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Art. 5(3) – Peter Pinckney v. KDG Mediatech AG

Extending the Limits of Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Data Outside the EU – Is There a Need to Rebalance?

“Bayer v. Natco” : Decision of the Bombay High Court 15 July 2014 – Writ Petition No. 1323 of 2013

“Access Rights” (Zugriffsrechte) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 October 2014 – Case No. X ZR 35/11

Reset and Go: The Unitary Patent System Post-Brexit

“Samsung v. Apple” : Decision of the Intellectual Property High Court 16 May 2014 – Case No. 2013 (Heisei 25) (ra) 10007 and 10008

Regulation (EU) No. 542/2014 and the International Jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court