NDLI: “Pirate Bay” : European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Copyright Year	2013
Abstract	1. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights applies not only to the content of the information but also to the means of transmission or reception since any restriction of such means interferes with the right to receive and impart information. 2. The freedom of expression of Art. 10 is granted to everyone, irrespective of whether the aim pursued is profit-making or not. 3. Interference with the right to freedom of expression is justified when such is “prescribed by law”, pursues a legitimate aim and is “necessary in a democratic society” to attain such aims. 4. When determining whether an interference is “necessary”, the nature of the competing interests involved as well as the degree to which those interests require protection must be taken into account. In casu, the interest in sharing information must be weighed against the interest in protecting the rights of copyright-holders. 5. The State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation in regard to the test of “necessity in a democratic society” and the balance of competing interests. 6. The nature and severity of penalties imposed are factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of interference with the freedom of expression guaranteed.
Starting Page	724
Ending Page	724
Page Count	1
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00189855
Journal	IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume Number	44
Issue Number	6
e-ISSN	21950237
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2013-08-20
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article
Subject	Political Science and International Relations Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

“Ashby Donald and others v. France” : European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10; French Intellectual Property Code, Art. L. 122-5 9° – Ashby Donald and others v. France

“Allergy Treatment” : European Patent Convention, Art. 38 – Teva v. Sepracor

“Encryption Process” (Verschlüsselungsverfahren) : European Patent Convention, Art. 138(1)(c)

“Lift Multi-Group Control System” : European Patent Convention, Art. 56

“Leflunomid” : European Patent Convention, Art. 56; Patent Act, Sec. 4

“Engraving Machine” : European Patent Convention, Art. 138(1)(e) – Pio Echeverria Lizarazou v. Sic Marketing SAS

Copyright on the Human Rights’ Trial: Redefining the Boundaries of Exclusivity Through Freedom of Expression

“Method for Breeding Tomatoes/Israel” : European Patent Convention, Art. 53(b)

“Gelomyrtol” : European Patent Convention, Art. 54(2); Patent Act, Sec. 3(1)

“Pirate Bay” : European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10 – Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden

Similar Documents

“Ashby Donald and others v. France” : European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10; French Intellectual Property Code, Art. L. 122-5 9° – Ashby Donald and others v. France

“Allergy Treatment” : European Patent Convention, Art. 38 – Teva v. Sepracor

“Encryption Process” (Verschlüsselungsverfahren) : European Patent Convention, Art. 138(1)(c)

“Lift Multi-Group Control System” : European Patent Convention, Art. 56

“Leflunomid” : European Patent Convention, Art. 56; Patent Act, Sec. 4

“Engraving Machine” : European Patent Convention, Art. 138(1)(e) – Pio Echeverria Lizarazou v. Sic Marketing SAS

Copyright on the Human Rights’ Trial: Redefining the Boundaries of Exclusivity Through Freedom of Expression

“Method for Breeding Tomatoes/Israel” : European Patent Convention, Art. 53(b)

“Gelomyrtol” : European Patent Convention, Art. 54(2); Patent Act, Sec. 3(1)

“Pirate Bay” : European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10 – Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden