NDLI: “Protein Separation” (Proteintrennung) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 18 March 2014

Content Provider	Springer Nature Link
Copyright Year	2015
Abstract	1. A patent nullity action is not to be regarded as an abuse of the law merely because the nullity plaintiff failed to join an earlier action filed by a party against whom an action had been brought for the infringement of the patent at issue as a joined party or intervener, but initially awaited the outcome of these proceedings instead. 2. A prior publication can also disclose what is not expressly mentioned in the patent claim and the description but which is self-evident to the person skilled in the art for the execution of the protected teaching and for this reason does not require separate disclosure but is instead “read into” the document. However, the inclusion of the self-evident does not permit specialist knowledge to be added to the disclosure, but merely serves to identify the complete meaning, i.e. the technical information that the expert reader will derive from the source against the background of his specialist knowledge (confirmation of the decision of this Court of 16 December 2008, Case No. X ZR 89/07 – Olanzapine [40 IIC 596 (2009)]). 3. If from the description of a method to manufacture a protein concentrate suitable for therapeutic use it follows for the person skilled in the art that further process steps are needed to achieve usability for therapeutic purposes, a measure that at the time of priority was the usual means in practice to achieve this objective is covered by the disclosure in the publication. DW
Starting Page	473
Ending Page	473
Page Count	1
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00189855
Journal	IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume Number	46
Issue Number	4
e-ISSN	21950237
Language	English
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publisher Date	2015-05-30
Publisher Place	Berlin, Heidelberg
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Patent nullity action Disclosure in the publication Inclusion of the obvious International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law Patent description Abuse of the law
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Case study
Subject	Political Science and International Relations Law

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

“Protein Separation” (Proteintrennung)

“Access Rights” (Zugriffsrechte) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 October 2014 – Case No. X ZR 35/11

“Forced Action Mixer” (Zwangsmischer) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 December 2014 – Case No. X ZR 151/12

“Pemetrexed” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 June 2016 – Case No. X ZR 29/15

“BMW-Emblem” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 March 2015 – Case No. I ZR 153/14

“Rotor Elements” (Rotorelemente) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 May 2015 – Case No. X ZR 43/13

“Communication Channel” (Kommunikationskanal) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 11 February 2014 – Case No. X ZR 107/12

“The Reality II” (Die Realität II) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2015 – Case No. I ZR 46/12

“Joint Strip” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 27 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 11/13

“Protein Separation” (Proteintrennung) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 18 March 2014 – Case No. X ZR 77/12

Similar Documents

“Protein Separation” (Proteintrennung)

“Access Rights” (Zugriffsrechte) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 October 2014 – Case No. X ZR 35/11

“Forced Action Mixer” (Zwangsmischer) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 2 December 2014 – Case No. X ZR 151/12

“Pemetrexed” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 14 June 2016 – Case No. X ZR 29/15

“BMW-Emblem” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 March 2015 – Case No. I ZR 153/14

“Rotor Elements” (Rotorelemente) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 12 May 2015 – Case No. X ZR 43/13

“Communication Channel” (Kommunikationskanal) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 11 February 2014 – Case No. X ZR 107/12

“The Reality II” (Die Realität II) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 9 July 2015 – Case No. I ZR 46/12

“Joint Strip” : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 27 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 11/13

“Protein Separation” (Proteintrennung) : Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 18 March 2014 – Case No. X ZR 77/12